In-Use / USA Commercial V6 /

General

Information correct as of 23rdApril 2024. Please see kb.breeam.com for the latest compliance information.

Asset classification – co-living developments - KBCN1568

The following is a guide only. Every project is unique, and assessors must in all cases review the suitability of the criteria to determine the most appropriate asset classification. Co-living features Co-living developments generally combine: Classification As a guide, assessors can also consider how their asset is classified according to local regulations.

Asset performance eligibility criteria – Industrial assets - KBCN1471

The following guidance seeks to clarify how the eligibility criteria within the Scope section of the technical manual should be interpreted, particularly (though not exclusively) for industrial-type assets. 1) The asset must be a complete and finished structure. A complete and finished structure means an enclosed, permanent structure with a roof and walls intended to accommodate people and/or processes. a) Asset Performance No more than 20% of the Gross Internal Area (GIA) can be classified as ‘unfitted’ at the point of submission. The assessment information provided must be correct at the point of submission to BRE Global for certification To demonstrate that no more than 20% of the GIA (the assessed area) is ‘unfitted’, 80% of the GIA of the asset must be ‘ready for occupation’. This means it must be in a finished state, ready for occupation, or already operating in the intended function/process. This ‘finished’ state could be a controlled environment for a manufacturing process, warm or cold storage, IT or other technical operation. Alternatively, this could be an unconditioned internal environment, such as storage or packing and where most likely the only service fitted is electric lighting. The requirement for 80% of areas to be operational or ready for occupancy applies to the total assessed area, including areas fitted out for processes and spaces conditioned for human occupancy. 2) The asset must contain occupiable or occupied space(s) which is designed to be continuously occupied for 30 minutes or more per day by a building user. This is required to assess some criteria and award credits relating specifically to human occupation. In order to demonstrate that a space is designed to be continuously occupied for 30 minutes or more per day by building users these spaces must be conditioned for human occupation and provided with basic services. Some examples of asset areas that meet this definition are offices, homes, retail, leisure areas which have ventilation, light and energy and water supplies, e.g. heating and/or cooling and access to a toilet and hand washing facilities. However, process-based assets, which have any areas that are environmentally controlled by building services systems for human occupation OR processes, are eligible for assessment. a) Asset Performance An asset not yet occupied can still be assessed. Provided that it meets the criteria above and is ready for occupation
09 Aug 2021 Criteria relating to occupied space updated
 

Asset performance eligibility criteria – Self-storage assets - KBCN1514

The following guidance seeks to clarify how the eligibility criteria within the Scope section of the technical manual should be interpreted for Self-Storage assets.

Defining self-storage assets

Self-storage provides space for individuals to rent and store their personal or business belongings. The storage space - also referred to as storage units - is typically rented on a month-to-month basis.  This space will make up the most space for any self-storage asset type. Typical Scenarios:

Scope

Eligibility Criteria
Criterion 1(a): no more than 20% of the Gross Internal Area (GIA) can be classified as 'Unfitted'. As per KBCN1471, this means that at least 80% of the GIA “must be in a finished state, ready for occupation, or already operating in the intended function/process. This ‘finished’ state could be a controlled environment for a manufacturing process, warm or cold storage, IT or other technical operation. Alternatively, this could be an unconditioned internal environment, such as storage or packing and where most likely the only service fitted is electric lighting.” Criterion 1(b): no more than 20% of the Gross Internal Area (GIA) can be classified as 'Vacant'. This requirement would only apply to office or staff spaces within the Self-Storage asset rather than the storage units themselves. The Storage units must be in a condition ready to be leased but do not need to be occupied during the period of assessment. Criterion 2: The asset must contain occupiable or occupied space(s) designed to be continuously occupied for 30 mins or more per day by a building user. This is required to assess some criteria and award credits relating specifically to human occupation. Within Self-Storage assets, office and amenity areas will meet this requirement. The Self-Storage space will also meet this requirement provided it has ventilation, light and energy and access to water supplies. Criterion 2(b): The asset must have been occupied at least 12 months prior to the start of the assessment. For Self-Storage assets “occupied” means that office areas must have been occupied and the storage units must be ready to be occupied 12 months prior to the start of the assessment.
Asset Type/Sub-type
This asset type shall be classified as Industrial. The asset sub-type shall be Distribution and Storage.

Evidence: Photographs not permitted for security reasons - KBCN0389

Where photographs are not permitted during a post-construction site visit for security reasons, in addition to any alternative evidence requirements listed in the Schedule of Evidence for each issue, the assessor will also need to provide a detailed site inspection report and/or as-built drawings (where permitted by the client). If following this approach, full justification and documentary evidence from the client will be required for QA purposes.

Recognizing future performance - KBCN1538

BREEAM In-Use recognizes an asset's operational performance at the time of certification. Compliance cannot be based on commitments to improve the performance of an asset in the future. Where changes to an asset are made during a 3-year certification cycle:

Volume Approach – Site visit requirements - KBCN1644

This guidance applies only to assessments for clients who have entered into a formal agreement with BRE to enter the Volume Approach. The aim of the Volume Approach is to assist clients with large numbers of assets, and their assessors, to conduct assessments in a robust manner, whilst also taking a practical view. From the clients’ assets that have entered the process, BRE will identify which assets may undertake a virtual site visit. The assets and their assessments cannot be new to the BREEAM In-Use process and must be identified and communicated to BRE prior to undertaking the site visits. The requirements of the virtual site visits are as follows: Gathering evidence for site assessments: In cases where BRE has identified an asset can undergo a virtual site visit, the assessor is not required to personally visit or gain access to the site, they can use the following methods:
  1. Appoint a suitable individual, for example a main contractor or asset manager, to undertake a formal site assessment on their behalf. The appointed individual would be expected to provide a robust account to the assessor of evidence in place of their own site assessment report. We would expect the report to contain photographs and/or virtual tour stills from the building and be signed off by both the appointed individual and assessor.
  2. For assessment issues relating to external spaces beyond the site, we will accept stills/images from Google Street View (or equivalent), provided it is demonstrated that such evidence is current.
  3. Desk-based evidence will be accepted where evidence demonstrates that the criteria are being met as far as possible without a site assessment.
It is important to note that where one of the above 3 options has been selected, the assessor is responsible for assessing the evidence and for the awarding of any credits. Timing of workshops, testing and other subsidiary evidence submissions: Given the widespread availability of remote communication technologies, it is generally possible to undertake the majority of activities relating to our assessment criteria without the need for face-to-face contact or site assessments. With respect to workshops, the key consideration is that they take place at a time when they have a meaningful impact and achieve the aim of the criteria. With respect to subsidiary, third party assessments such as ecological site inspections or audits, desktop surveys based on available information (e.g. planning surveys, agent’s reports, photographs, Google Earth), can be used as an alternative provided there is enough material for a confident recommendation and/or outcome to be achieved.    
Information correct as of 23rdApril 2024. Please see kb.breeam.com for the latest compliance information.