New Construction / International /

V7

Information correct as of 19thApril 2026. Please see kb.breeam.com for the latest compliance information.

Approved Equivalent Roles List (AERL) - KBCN1809

BREEAM International standards are unique because of their flexibility. For International projects, Assessors can submit roles to substitute those described in the Technical Manuals. Provided that such roles are equivalent to the BREEAM specified roles, BRE Global will approve them for use in a particular country or region. The Approved Equivalent Roles List is a record of all roles that BRE Global has approved to date. The list is periodically updated to reflect recent approvals or withdrawals. Using existing approved roles Where you are using an approved role, and not the role described in the criteria in the scheme Technical Manuals, a copy of the AERL should be included as part of your evidence submission for QA. AERL versions The version of the AERL that is current at the time of registration is the one that is used for assessment. Newer versions released after this can also be used, however older versions before the registration date cannot be used. For example: if the version current at registration was v3.0, then v3.0 (or any later versions) can be used, but v2.0 (or any earlier versions) cannot be used. Proposing new roles New roles cannot be proposed if they are not of equal competency to the BREEAM requirements. Only roles which are equivalent or more rigorous than the BREEAM default roles are considered. If you wish to propose a new role which you think is equivalent in your country or region:
  1. Check what the role needs to cover by referring to the roles described in the scheme Technical Manual definition.
  2. Complete BF2599 BREEAM Approved Equivalent Roles Application Form and send this to our Technical Team via the Query Webform, adding AERL into the subject field.
The information provided to us within this form must include: We will need a few weeks to review the information (please check with us for time scales). If there is missing information, or the information is not clearly referenced, this might take longer. If successful, we will send you a revised copy of the AERL which includes the new role, and will update this for future versions of the AERL.

Assessment of multiple buildings within a single BREEAM assessment - KBCN1836

Ene01, Ene02 and Wat01, which use area-weighted performance scales, must be assessed using the methodology set out below where multiple buildings are included within the scope of a single BREEAM assessment, including where: • the Similar Buildings approach is applied, in accordance with Section 4 of GN20; or • Separate buildings with a single overarching function are located on the same site, in accordance with Section 6 of GN20 (e.g. a principal building with one or more ancillary or supporting buildings). Ene01 For UK NC projects, energy models (BRUKL files) must be uploaded for each building included within the assessment. For International NC projects, the assessor must enter floor area-weighted average values for the relevant energy performance metrics for both the actual building(s) and the reference building(s), covering all buildings and applicable building uses included in the assessment. Ene02 All buildings included within the assessment must be modelled in accordance with the methodology. The energy performance score must be calculated using floor area-weighted metrics covering all buildings, and compared against a benchmark derived from a floor area weighted average of all building types included within the assessment. Wat01 For Wat01, the assessor must enter details for all water-using components across all buildings included within the assessment. The Wat01 benchmark is determined using a floor area-weighted occupancy by building type, covering all buildings within scope of the BREEAM assessment.

ASWL Process update - KBCN1756

Formerly known as the ASWL for V6 and 2016, this has been renamed as Approved Standards List (ASL) for V7. It follows a similar Excel format to the International New Construction ASWL for V6 and 2016 versions. The V7 ASL document has been updated to align with the International New Construction V7 manual.  In Version 7, we’ve introduced several updates to improve the approved standards and weightings process: 

Bamboo, cork and other non-timber forest products – Responsible sourcing - KBCN1768

Non-timber forest products, such as bamboo and cork should be responsibly sourced to minimise the environmental impacts and protect local ecosystems. However, as they are not timber or timber-based products, these fall outside the scope of the Prerequisite. Where such products are integrated into a building, they should, nonetheless, be assessed and included in the calculator under ‘Other materials’.

BREEAM Excel Tools - KBCN1755

The new BREEAM Platform now integrates all Excel-based calculator tools directly into the system for a more streamlined experience. Simply input your data, and the platform will automatically calculate and display the results.   Please note, this functionality currently applies only to BREEAM New Construction V7. 

BREEAM New Construction V7 – FAQs - KBCN1754

The FAQ webpage has been developed to provide early clarification and guidance on aspects of BREEAM New Construction Version 7 (NC V7). It is intended to address questions and highlight key changes from previous versions. Further guidance is provided within the published technical manual, and this will be supplemented by Knowledge Base Compliance Notes (KBCNs). To see the full list of FAQs, please refer to the Version 7 FAQs webpage

Capped gas supplies – Shell & core assessments - KBCN1818

If a capped-off gas supply is provided, this does not prevent credits from being awarded under criterion 1. The key requirement is that all heating and hot water systems designed or installed within the scope of works (the core services) must use non-combustion systems.

Capped gas supplies – Shell & core assessments - KBCN1818

If a capped-off gas supply is provided, this does not prevent credits from being awarded under criterion 1. The key requirement is that all heating and hot water systems designed or installed within the scope of works (the core services) must use non-combustion systems.

Clarification of ‘Embodied carbon benchmark comparison’ - KBCN1819

The embodied carbon benchmark comparison must always be based on the latest appropriate LCA stage that corresponds to the BREEAM assessment stage being pursued. The purpose of the benchmark comparison is to assess outcome-based embodied carbon performance, using data that is representative of the building at the relevant assessment stage.

Assessment stage requirements

Interim (Design Stage) BREEAM assessments

Final Post-Construction Stage (PCS) BREEAM assessments

If a PCS LCA is not undertaken, benchmark comparison credits cannot be awarded at final assessment, regardless of whether a technical design LCA was previously completed. This aligns with wider industry frameworks (e.g. RICS WLCA v2 and the UK Net Zero Carbon Buildings Standard), which anchor performance claims to as-built outcomes.

Daylight – Shading devices - KBCN1815

If any of the assessed spaces are expected to contain moveable shading device (such as blinds), then a dynamic modelling of their use should be included in the calculation for options 2 and 3, consideration should be made to the shading guidance in EN 17037 or IES LM-83-23, respectively. Option 1 does not have to include dynamic modelling of moveable shading devices. This will be updated in the next re-issue of the new construction version 7 schemes.

Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging – Shared Parking for New Buildings, Extensions, and Phased Developments - KBCN1827

The required number of EV charging points must be based on the total number of parking spaces that serve the assessed building. This total includes both existing spaces and any new spaces associated with the project. Where parking is shared across a wider site, the “associated” number of spaces refers to the amount of parking the assessed building is expected to rely on for its occupants. A proportional allocation calculation must be used to determine this number. Example: If a project sits on a site with 1,000 shared spaces but the new building’s occupancy requires only 100 spaces, the EV requirement is calculated based on 100 spaces, not the full 1,000.
 
  1. General Requirements
    • Defining the parking that counts. Use a proportional allocation method to determine how many spaces in a shared car park are associated with the project.
    • Short-stay exclusion: Short-stay spaces with a maximum stay of 15 minutes (e.g., pick-up/drop-off bays) are excluded from the EV calculation.
    • EV Charging points location: EV charging points should be installed as close as possible to the building’s main entrance to ensure convenient access for the building users.
    • Existing infrastructure: Existing EV charging points in a shared car park can only be counted when:
      • They exceed the BREEAM requirement for the buildings they were originally installed to serve,
      • They meet current BREEAM requirements, and
      • They form part of the new project’s allocated parking.
    • No “legacy” exclusions: Existing parking spaces cannot be excluded simply because they predate the BREEAM assessment. If the spaces serve the assessed building, they are in scope.
    • Operational policy. It is recommended, but not mandatory, that building management implement operational measures (e.g., signage, permits, digital access controls) to help ensure that EV spaces are used by the intended building users.
  2. New Buildings on a Site or Extensions
    • Calculation basis for new buildings or extensions, EV requirements must be based on the total parking demand associated with the project, including both existing associated spaces and any new spaces created.
    • Proportional allocation formula
      • Determine the project’s share of the total site parking using either GIA or occupancy.
      • Allocated project parking = Total site parking × (Project GIA ÷ Total GIA), OR
      • Allocated project parking = Total site parking × (Project occupancy ÷ Total occupancy)
  3. Phased Development
    • Current Phase: The EV calculation should be based on the parking demand of the phase under assessment, including the existing infrastructure and any new parking spaces delivered in that phase.
    • Existing Infrastructure: EV charging provision installed in previous phases may count towards compliance where it meets the required threshold for the current phase
    • Future Phases: Provisions in future phases may be counted only if secured by a legally binding commitment (such as a signed contract or planning obligation) with a confirmed delivery timeline.

Emissions from products – specialist paints and coatings - KBCN0872

Where a paint or coating falls within: then the paint or coating must be assessed. Specialist paints and coatings are exempted from meeting the VOC content and emission limits where there are no alternative products available that can perform the function, and still meet the emission limits. This must be clearly evidenced. 
30-Oct-2025 Applicable to HQM V6 and UKNCR V6.1
02-Oct-2025 Reference to 'VOC content' added and KBCN applied to UKNC V7 and INC V7 to clarify CN2.1 
27-Oct-2022 Wording clarified. New compliance principle added from UKNC V6.
10-Oct-2022 Title amended for clarity. Scheme applicability updated.
13-Mar-2020 KBCN amended to clarify exceptions and applicability.
16-Jun-2017 Content merged with KBCN0212.

ERRATUM – Enhanced Amenities - KBCN1817

The wording and approach to assessing ‘enhanced’ amenities in the technical manual is incorrect. The Aim of this assessment issue is, ‘To maximise the potential for people to choose public, active and lower-emission private transport by providing the site with convenient, sustainable options.’ In line with this intent, an ‘enhanced amenity’ should be referred to as an additional amenity, as it must provide an additional compliant amenity resulting from the development. If a development provides an amenity to replace an existing amenity, regardless of whether there is a qualitative enhancement or change of amenity type, this must be considered as an existing amenity. Furthermore, an additional amenity provided by the development may only be considered as such where there is a net increase in the number of compliant amenities resulting from the development. The updated guidance can be found below:   Option 10 - Additional amenities: Provide compliant additional amenities within less than or equal to 500 m of the building entrance. M4.2: Additional amenities Two or three points can be awarded for providing additional amenities ≤ 500 m via a safe pedestrian route. If additional amenities duplicate the services provided by existing amenities, this is still recognised. This is because duplicate amenities still create additional choices for users in terms of services offered and location. If a development provides an amenity to replace an existing amenity, regardless of whether there is a qualitative enhancement or change of amenity type, this must be considered as an existing amenity. A new amenity provided by the development may only be considered as ‘additional’ where there is a net increase in the number of compliant amenities resulting from the development. 2 points: at least one additional amenity 3 points: two or more additional amenities This will be updated in the next reissue of the technical manual.

Erratum – INC V7 Hea10 Natural hazards – CN3 - KBCN1833

CN3 incorrectly states- ‘Where flooding is the only risk identified, this issue will  not be included in the assessment as flooding is addressed in Pol03 Flood and surface water management on page 381’ It should say - ‘Where flooding is the only risk identified, Criterion 2 is not applicable as flood mitigation is addressed in Pol03 Flood and surface water management on page 381’. Criterion 1 must still be achieved where ‘Natural hazards’ has a >0% BREEAM weighting for the country/region. This can be viewed in the ‘Scoring and output’ section of the assessment. If a risk assessment has been carried out and it identifies that flooding is the only risk – choose ‘Yes’ to all questions under this issue to award the credit.   The technical manual and the platform will be updated accordingly in the next re-issue.

Erratum – NCV7 – Ene 08 Installed controls - KBCN1812

There is a printing error in the following: UKNC V7 Ene 08 Table 6.18 INC V7 Ene 08 Table 43 The correct options for Installed controls for space heating are:
Control type Control functionality Points awarded
Heat generator output – heat pumps Multi-stage control (e.g. several on/off compressors) 1
Variable control (e.g. hot gas bypass, inverter frequency control) 2
  The technical manual will be updated accordingly in the next re-issue.

ERRATUM – Scope – Mixed-use developments and building types - KBCN1820

The wording and approach set out for assessing mixed-use developments in the technical manual is incorrect. Developments comprising of separate buildings with different function types cannot be assessed under a single assessment, unless they meet the conditions for Section 6 of GN20 (Separate buildings with a single, over-arching function). The updated guidance can be found below: Mixed-use developments and building types BREEAM defines different criteria and benchmarks for some assessment issues according to building type, function and use. A single building that includes different functions areas, e.g. office and retail, can be assessed under a single BREEAM assessment. Each area will need to comply with the relevant criteria for the building type. BREEAM credits that are awarded based on performance scales, such as Ene 01, Ene 02, Wat 01 and Mat 01, will be calculated on an area weighted basis. Buildings that are a mix of commercial and residential asset types, and developments which comprise of separate buildings with different function types, will need separate BREEAM assessments. Further guidance can be found in Guidance Note 20.

ERRATUM – Scope – Mixed-use developments and building types - KBCN1820

The wording and approach set out for assessing mixed-use developments in the technical manual is incorrect. Developments comprising of separate buildings with different function types cannot be assessed under a single assessment, unless they meet the conditions for Section 6 of GN20 (Separate buildings with a single, over-arching function). The updated guidance can be found below: Mixed-use developments and building types BREEAM defines different criteria and benchmarks for some assessment issues according to building type, function and use. A single building that includes different functions areas, e.g. office and retail, can be assessed under a single BREEAM assessment. Each area will need to comply with the relevant criteria for the building type. BREEAM credits that are awarded based on performance scales, such as Ene 01, Ene 02, Wat 01 and Mat 01, will be calculated on an area weighted basis. Buildings that are a mix of commercial and residential asset types, and developments which comprise of separate buildings with different function types, will need separate BREEAM assessments. Further guidance can be found in Guidance Note 20.

Flood Risk Assessment older than five years - KBCN1744

This sentence appears in the definition of 'Flood Risk Assessment': Where more than five years have passed since the FRA was carried out, evidence would be required to demonstrate that the basis of the FRA has not changed in that time. The requirement for evidence that the basis of the FRA has not changed where more than five years have passed is applicable only at Design Stage. It is not required at Post Construction Stage where a compliant FRA was undertaken at Design Stage and the development was carried out in accordance with that design.

Glare control – Modelling - KBCN1800

The ‘Glare control’ criteria do not require a specific methodology to be used to identify areas at risk of glare, and in most situations, a simple solar path analysis would be suitable. Alternatively, detailed hourly modelling methods, such as DGP and ASE, may be more appropriate. However, in either case, compliance cannot be assumed. Regardless of the methodology used, the modelling must be supported by robust reporting to demonstrate that each aspect of the criteria has been met.

GN20 Assessing mixed-use and multiple buildings – BREEAM V7 - KBCN0717

Latest version: v1.0, January 2026 Guidance Note 20 (GN20) provides information to help BREEAM Assessors formulate an assessment strategy for mixed-use developments, assets that include different levels of fit out, and for multiple buildings or units on the same site using BREEAM V7. This guidance note only applies to BREEAM V7. There is a separate guidance note for earlier versions of BREEAM NC and RFO (see Guidance Note 10). Download Guidance Note 20 View all Guidance Notes on BREEAM Projects (licensed assessors only) 
29-Jan-2026 - Updated for release of GN20 1.0

GN22 Recognised schemes for emissions from construction products - KBCN0719

Latest version: v3.1, March 2026 Within the Health and Wellbeing category of several BREEAM schemes, credits are awarded for specifying materials that minimise emissions from building products of formaldehyde and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The criteria involve meeting emission level performance requirements in accordance with compliant performance and testing standards. Guidance Note 22 (GN22) lists schemes that show equivalent or better performance than the current BREEAM and HQM criteria, and therefore can be used to demonstrate compliance with the criteria. This document should be read in conjunction with the relevant assessment issue guidance provided in the appropriate BREEAM or HQM technical manual. The guidance note contains two tables: Download Guidance Note 22 View all Guidance Notes on BREEAM Projects (licensed assessors only) Applying for inclusion in GN22 The list of approved schemes is based on those which have made a successful application to BREEAM. As such, there may be other operational schemes that could potentially be recognised. To be considered for inclusion, the scheme operator must complete an application form, providing full details of the scheme, and submit this to BRE Global for technical approval. A flat rate charge is payable to cover the costs of administering and reviewing the application. GN22 will be updated following the approval of any schemes via this process. The application form (BF1648) provides full details of the application process, and licensed BREEAM assessors can request a copy by submitting a technical query using the webform. Other parties may request a copy by contacting: breeam@bregroup.com 
25-Mar-2026 - Release of GN22 3.1
30-Oct-2025 - Applicable to HQM V6 and UKNCR V6.1
25-Sep-2025 - Updated to provide details of the approval process and title updated.
30-Jan-2025 - Release of GN22 3.0
30-Sep-2024 - Release of GN22 2.9
01-Feb-2024 - Release of GN22 2.8
31-Jan-2023 - Release of GN22 2.7
10-Oct-2022 - This KBCN merged with KBCN0646. Title amended to align with standard KBCN naming format for clarity and consistency. Made applicable to UK and International NC V6.
25-Jan-2019 - Link to Guidance Note updated
12-Mar-2018 - Link to Guidance Note updated

GN41 Reporting template for ecology assessment issues – BREEAM V7 - KBCN1748

Latest version: v0.0, July 2025 Guidance Note 41 (GN41) is an optional template to help Assessors relate information generated during a project to the latest ecology assessment issues in BREEAM NC V7. This is a new template for V7. There is a separate reporting template for previous versions of BREEAM UK NC, BREEAM UKNCR, and HQM (see Guidance Note 40). Download Guidance Note 41 View all Guidance Notes on BREEAM Projects (licensed assessors only)

GN49 International Ene 01 calculation methodology guidance - KBCN1749

Latest version: v0.0, July 2025 Guidance Note 49 (GN49) gives background information on the methodology for determining the number of credits achieved for energy performance under the Ene 01 assessment issue for BREEAM International NC V7. The Ene 01 methodology uses a triple metric approach that addresses energy demand for heating and cooling, primary energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions. The aim of using this approach is to minimise the energy consumption and carbon emissions from regulated energy uses and to maximise the use of low carbon energy sources. Guidance Note 49 also includes the adjustment factors that are applied to uplift the reference metrics in Ene 01 for BREEAM International NC V7. It describes the methodology for determining the factors and the application process to have a country’s adjustment factor added or updated. Download Guidance Note 49 View all Guidance Notes on BREEAM Projects (licensed assessors only)

GN53 Energy modelling and predicted operational energy performance score in Ene 02 - KBCN1751

Latest version: v0.2, February 2026 Guidance Note 53 (GN53) provides guidance for the predictive energy modelling and predicted operational energy performance score credits within Ene 02, detailing the input process for the issue’s operational energy calculator. Download Guidance Note 53 View all Guidance Notes on BREEAM Projects (licensed assessors only) 
16-Feb-2026 - Updated for release of GN53 0.2

GN54 Responsible construction management – BREEAM V7 - KBCN1752

Latest version: v0.0, July 2025 Guidance Note 54 (GN54) provides information on achieving the responsible construction management requirements in Man 03 in BREEAM V7. It has two parts: This guidance note only applies to BREEAM V7. There is a separate guidance note for earlier versions of BREEAM UK NC and UKNCR (see Guidance Note 33). Download Guidance Note 54 View all Guidance Notes on BREEAM Projects (licensed assessors only)

Hotels and other short stay accommodation – cycle storage unit of measure - KBCN0676

The cycle storage requirement for hotels and other short‑stay accommodation is 1 space per 10 staff. Guests or visitors staying at the hotel are excluded from the calculation. Where a hotel includes on‑site facilities such as conference spaces, restaurants, or gyms, visitors to these facilities should also be included in the cycle-storage calculation: 1 space per 10 guests. Specific Note for Refurbishment and Fit Out International 2015 Table 36 in the technical manual incorrectly refers to “1 staff and 1 visitor, or 1 bed.” Please ignore this error and follow the guidance above. 
16-Feb-2026 - Wording update to be applicable across multiple BREEAM Schemes
20-Oct-2025 - Guidance clarified and updated to align with all current BREEAM scheme guidance.
23-Jul-2018 Wording added to include clarification on what to base the calculation of cycle spaces on.
Technical manual to be updated accordingly in next re-issue.

Independent third party – clarification on the definition - KBCN1805

For the purposes of BREEAM, sister companies or parent companies cannot be considered as third parties.  To be classed as an independent third party, there must be no professional connection or relationship between the LCA consultant/energy assessor, or their company, and the verification body. The third-party verifier must be independent of the LCA or energy assessor and demonstrate impartiality (for general principles, see ISO 17029). To qualify as a third party, the verifier must belong to an organisation not involved in the project and must not provide advice to the project, as this could compromise their impartiality during verification.

Knowledge Base – Applicability of existing guidance to NC V7 - KBCN1757

We are in the process of undertaking a comprehensive review of existing guidance on the Knowledge Base for BREEAM New Construction to determine its applicability to New Construction Version 7, and the Knowledge Base will be updated in due course. In the meantime, if you wish to apply for a previous KBCN, please review the changes outlined in the Summary of Changes and compare the criteria in the technical manuals. If the criteria are the same, and you are satisfied that a previous New Construction KBCN is relevant to NC V7, you can follow this guidance. If there are differences in the New Construction V7 criteria, but you believe an existing KBCN can be applied, please submit a technical query on the webform to confirm this.

LCC – Competent person or Suitably Qualified Cost Consultant (SQCC) - KBCN1803

The definition of a competent person, or SQCC as named within HQM or BREEAM New Construction Residential, has been updated to provide further clarification and is now defined as set out below: An individual achieving all the following items can be considered to be ‘suitably qualified’ for the purpose of completing the LCC credits:
  1. Holds a recognised qualification for undertaking life cycle costing studies and/or a degree/postgraduate diploma or equivalent qualification in quantity surveying, construction economics or other construction-related subject.
  2. Has acquired substantial expertise through a minimum of three years relevant experience (within the last five years). The experience must clearly demonstrate a practical understanding of life cycle costing in construction and the built environment and show an ability to identify and demonstrate cost and performance enhancement measures.
  3. Is not professionally connected to a single manufacturer
A CV should be provided demonstrating their experience and knowledge against the above requirements.  

Legally harvested and traded timber – Examples - KBCN0956

The following examples are considered compliant for BREEAM: Legally harvested:
  1. Evidence of compliance with the UK government Timber Procurement Policy (see here, timber bought inside the UK only)
  2. FSC, PEFC, SFI or GiB certification
  3. Evidence of compliance with the EUTR (timber bought inside the EU only)
  4. Risk assessment/due diligence documentation demonstrating a low risk of non-compliance with the ‘legally harvested’ requirements given in the manual.
Legally traded:
  1. Evidence of compliance with the UK government Timber Procurement Policy (see here, timber bought inside the UK only)
  2. FSC, PEFC, SFI or GiB certification
  3. Risk assessment/due diligence documentation demonstrating a low risk of non-compliance with the ‘legally traded’ requirements given in the manual.
04-Dec-2025 - Examples updated to include Grown in Britain (GiB) certification. Previous reference to 'CPET' clarified as 'UK government Timber Procurement Policy'.
KBCN applied more widely to all relevant scheme issues in BREEAM and HQM

Life Cycle Assessment for multiple buildings within a single assessment (GN20 – Section 6) - KBCN1835

Where a BREEAM assessment includes multiple buildings on the same site with a single, over-arching function, in accordance with Section 6 of GN20 (e.g. a principal building with one or more ancillary or supporting buildings), and where these are not classified as ‘similar buildings’, each building must be assessed and reported separately within the LCA. A single aggregated result for the whole site is not sufficient on its own, even where a single coordinated LCA model is used. Shared elements (e.g. substructure, external works, or building services serving multiple buildings) may be apportioned between buildings using a reasonable and transparent method (e.g. by gross internal area or other appropriate project-specific metric), in line with recognised industry approaches. For the purposes of BREEAM benchmarking under Mat 01: • The results submitted to the platform must represent a single building, not a combined site-wide result. • Where multiple buildings are included within an assessment, benchmarking (in kgCO₂e/m²) must be based on the principal building. Where no clear principal building exists, the largest building should be used. Full evidence must be provided to demonstrate: • That all buildings within scope are included, with individual LCAs completed for each building, and • How results have been separated and, where relevant, how shared elements have been allocated.
Rationale: Industry standards such as RICS guidance and the UK Net Zero Carbon Buildings Standard define assessment boundaries at the building (asset) level, while allowing aggregation at project level only where individual building results are also reported. Requiring building-level results ensures consistency with industry practice, maintains comparability with BREEAM benchmarks, and avoids distortion where multiple buildings are combined into a single result. 
Note: This approach applies until further platform functionality is available to support multi-building submissions directly.

Life Cycle Assessment where similar buildings approach is being followed (GN20 – Section 4) - KBCN1834

Where multiple buildings are included within the scope of a single BREEAM assessment following the Similar Buildings approach, in accordance with Section 4 of GN20, unless identical, each building must be assessed and reported separately within the LCA. Shared elements (e.g. substructure, external works, or building services serving multiple buildings) may be apportioned between buildings using a reasonable and transparent method (e.g. by gross internal area or other appropriate project-specific metric), in line with recognised industry approaches. For the purposes of BREEAM benchmarking under Mat 01: • The results submitted to the platform must represent a single building, not a combined site-wide result. • Where multiple buildings are included within an assessment, the worst-performing building (in kgCO₂e/m²) must be used for benchmarking in line with the Similar Buildings methodology (section 4.2 of GN20). Full evidence must be provided to demonstrate: • That all buildings within scope of the assessment have been included, with individual LCAs completed for each building, and • How results have been separated and, where relevant, how shared elements have been allocated.
Rationale: In line with Section 4.2 of GN20, BREEAM issues must be assessed for each individual building, with credits awarded based on the worst‑performing building for each assessment issue. The Similar Buildings approach therefore remains an individual‑building assessment methodology and does not constitute a site‑wide assessment, even where multiple buildings are included.

Meeting the minimum standard requirement – compliance when chain of custody is broken - KBCN1816

Where there is a broken chain in the last link between the purchase and delivery of certified timber from the supplier and the forwarding distribution of the timber to the site under assessment, such as where the timber has been delivered to a subcontractor or fabricator’s premises instead of direct to site (e.g. as part of a bulk order or where limited storage is available on site), compliance can still be achieved if a documented risk assessment confirms that there is low risk of mixing or substitution of certified and non-certified timber. Ways to demonstrate compliance: A. Verification that the subcontractor or fabricator only purchases and uses certified timber. There must be robust mechanisms in place to verify that all timber materials purchased and delivered originate from sustainably managed sources. This includes maintaining documented timber procurement policies and procedures that mandate certified timber orders and delivery checks. Comprehensive supplier details should be readily accessible for review upon request to demonstrate that all timber is certified. B. Where non-certified timber is handled/stored or sourced, that there are robust control measures in place to prevent any substitution or mixing of certified and non-certified timber at every stage of the process. Documentation demonstrating compliance should be maintained and made available upon request. Examples of appropriate control measures are listed below:
Control
Evidence required
Purchasing records All purchase orders, requisition notes, and contracts must explicitly specify the product details and confirm that materials are to originate from legal and sustainable sources.

Segregated storage of timber

 Site layout map, stock control processes and records to confirm that certified timber is stored away from non-certified timber.
Segregated delivery of timber to site - All timber must be thoroughly inspected and verified before shipment to confirm that it is correctly marked/labelled as FSC/PEFC-certified. - Delivery notes must be accurately maintained. - A second-party verification process to check tickets and stock, must be carried out upon site delivery to confirm certified status of timber.
Documentation Comprehensive documentation must enable independent assessors to trace any timber back to its sustainable source. This includes maintaining purchase records, goods-inward notices, stock records, and sales documentation such as orders and invoices.
The above is guidance and should not replace any local or national requirements for the sourcing of legally traded and harvested timber.

Site wide approach to ecological enhancements - KBCN1194

A site-wide approach to ecological enhancements can be used on sites where multiple buildings share areas of soft landscaping. The enhancement benefits are applied to the individual building assessments within the site. The benefit can be applied on a site-wide basis provided all developments are completed within the appropriate timeframe of a valid ecological survey. 
16-Apr-2026 - Applicable to NC V7
30-Oct-2025 - Applicable to HQM V6 and UKNCR V6.1

Verification of Security Needs Assessments/Security Risk Assessments - KBCN1770

Where the author of a Security Needs Assessment [‘Security Risk Assessment’ in BIU] does not meet the BREEAM competency requirements, compliance can still be achieved where the report is reviewed and verified by a qualified SQSS [‘Competent Person’ in BIU], who confirms in writing that it is accurate, appropriate and in line with industry best practice. In these circumstances, the SQSS or ‘Competent Person’ is expected to verify and take ownership of the report and accept professional responsibility for its content.

View out – communal lounges, living rooms and bedrooms - KBCN1828

The default criteria for these space types requires relevant positions to be within 5m of an opening. Where larger spaces are ≥ 50m2 NIA, the standard view out criteria for the relevant scheme is applied instead. The 5m rule is intended for small scale domestic spaces where proximity to a view out is beneficial. This KBCN recognises that for larger relevant spaces in Residential, Multi-Residential and Residential Institution asset types, a scalable approach in line with commercial buildings is more appropriate.

VOC credit issues – Clarification of scope - KBCN1797

The scope of these requirements does not include furnishings or moveable furniture, e.g. desks, seats or shelving. It includes fixtures and fittings that are integral to the building, such as kitchen units and toilet cubicles. However, bespoke fixtures, such as purpose-made items of fixed furniture, can be excluded, as the specified compliance testing is not appropriate for such items.
Information correct as of 19thApril 2026. Please see kb.breeam.com for the latest compliance information.