New Construction / UK / V7 /
01 - Management
Information correct as of 19thAugust 2026. Please see kb.breeam.com for the latest compliance information.
Considerate Constructors Scheme – Phased developments - KBCN0328
The Considerate Constructors Scheme does make provision for phased developments within the registration process, allowing each phase to be registered separately. They make this provision to allow for very large developments that may go on over several years. It should therefore be possible for the developer to register the site in phases, so that CCS certificates can be submitted for BREEAM assessed buildings, without having to wait for the completion of the final phase.
Elemental LCC and options appraisal timing - KBCN1889
The elemental LCC should be undertaken as part of the strategic options appraisal process and used to inform the selection of significant building elements and systems, such as the structure, envelope and building services. Completing the options appraisal after key design decisions have been finalised may reduce its effectiveness and limit the opportunity for the findings to influence the final design.
However, the timing requirement can still be met, where the assessor agrees that there is a justification for the appraisal continuing into early RIBA Stage 3 (or equivalent), and clear evidence to demonstrate that:
- The key options remained under consideration during the appraisal.
- The findings were capable of influencing the final design solution.
- The intended outcomes of the elemental LCC process have not been compromised.
In all cases, the outline elemental LCC plan and identification of relevant project options must be completed by the end of Concept Design
ERRATUM – Minimum standards Table 2.3 – Man04 - KBCN1832
The minimum standard for a very good rating within BREEAM issue Man04 Commissioning and handover, should refer to Criterion 11 and not criterion 12. The updated text can be found below:
- Technical and non-technical building user guide written. Criterion 11 (Handover)
01-Apr-2026 Technical manual will be updated accordingly in the next reissue
Erratum – Monitoring utility consumption – Meeting the set targets - KBCN1899
The target and actual total energy and water consumption figures must be entered into the platform. However, meeting the targets is not required for compliance.
The relevant criteria will be clarified in the next reissue.
Evidence requirements – responsible sourcing of materials at post-construction - KBCN1599
Whilst the UK BREEAM manuals are less prescriptive in the evidential requirements to allow flexibility, to ensure consistency across the schemes, it is expected that robust evidence should be provided to verify the source of any certified materials and how the assessor has confirmed the products and manufacturers used.
Evidence supplied at post construction stage must reflect the completed building and confirm the responsibly sourced materials that have been procured and installed on the project. Supporting documentation is required to validate letters of confirmation or schedules of materials.
Evidence provided could include proof of purchase, for example, invoices, delivery tickets, purchase orders or correspondence from suppliers. This may be an example for each material sourced, rather than every delivery ticket for instance. Alternatively, evidence of the use of the responsibly sourced materials may include as-built drawings, O&M documentation or site photographs.
30-Oct-2025 - Applicable to HQM V6 and UKNCR V6.1
GN54 Responsible construction management – BREEAM V7 - KBCN1752
Latest version: v1.0, July 2026
Guidance Note 54 (GN54) provides information on achieving the responsible construction management requirements in Man 03 in BREEAM V7.
It has two parts:
- Part 1 lists the requirements that must be met to achieve credits for responsible construction management in BREEAM V7.
- Part 2 provides a list of the schemes or tools that have been evaluated by BREEAM and can contribute to the achievement of one or more credits for responsible construction management.
This guidance note only applies to BREEAM V7. There is a separate guidance note for earlier versions of BREEAM UK NC and UKNCR (see
Guidance Note 33).
Download Guidance Note 54
View all Guidance Notes on BREEAM Projects (licensed assessors only)
15-Jul-2026 - Updated version released (v1.0)
LCC – Competent person or Suitably Qualified Cost Consultant (SQCC) - KBCN1803
The definition of a competent person, or SQCC as named within HQM or BREEAM New Construction Residential, has been updated to provide further clarification and is now defined as set out below:
An individual achieving all the following items can be considered to be ‘suitably qualified’ for the purpose of completing the LCC credits:
- Holds a recognised qualification for undertaking life cycle costing studies and/or a degree/postgraduate diploma or equivalent qualification in quantity surveying, construction economics or other construction-related subject.
- Has acquired substantial expertise through a minimum of three years relevant experience (within the last five years). The experience must clearly demonstrate a practical understanding of life cycle costing in construction and the built environment and show an ability to identify and demonstrate cost and performance enhancement measures.
- Is not professionally connected to a single manufacturer
A CV should be provided demonstrating their experience and knowledge against the above requirements.
Note for Non-Domestic New Construction V7:
The intention of the above is to provide clearer guidelines for assessors on who would be considered a suitable professional to carry out LCC option appraisals.
For New Construction V7.0, flexibility may be applied, and the definition can be considered to be met where point 3
and either point 1 or 2 of the above is demonstrated.
In addition, where it can be demonstrated that the LCC consultant was appointed prior to the release of KBCN1803 (18.10.2025), and that appointment was made based on the assessor’s professional judgement of what constitutes ‘recognised qualification’ and/or ‘substantial expertise’ at that time, similar flexibility may be applied. In such cases, sufficient justification and supporting evidence (e.g. CV and rationale for appointment) must be provided to demonstrate that the consultant was reasonably considered competent in line with the intent of the criteria at the time of appointment.
The definition will be updated in the next release of the technical manual (V7.1); therefore, any assessments under New Construction V7.1 and subsequent versions will need to meet all three requirements, and no such flexibility will apply.
26 May 2026: Note added regarding application against NC V7.
Legally harvested and traded timber – Examples - KBCN0956
The following examples are considered compliant for BREEAM:
Legally harvested:
- Evidence of compliance with the UK government Timber Procurement Policy (see here, timber bought inside the UK only)
- FSC, PEFC, SFI or GiB certification
- Evidence of compliance with the EUTR (timber bought inside the EU only)
- Risk assessment/due diligence documentation demonstrating a low risk of non-compliance with the ‘legally harvested’ requirements given in the manual.
Legally traded:
- Evidence of compliance with the UK government Timber Procurement Policy (see here, timber bought inside the UK only)
- FSC, PEFC, SFI or GiB certification
- Risk assessment/due diligence documentation demonstrating a low risk of non-compliance with the ‘legally traded’ requirements given in the manual.
04-Dec-2025 - Examples updated to include Grown in Britain (GiB) certification. Previous reference to 'CPET' clarified as 'UK government Timber Procurement Policy'.
KBCN applied more widely to all relevant scheme issues in BREEAM and HQM
Submitting aftercare & post occupancy evaluation data - KBCN0589
Where credits have been awarded which require post-occupancy evaluation or an element of aftercare data collection (according to scheme requirements) from the building once operational and occupied, the data gathering must take place at the specified time and the findings reported to BRE.
The timing of this evidence gathering depends on the criteria of the specific BREEAM scheme. However, for all schemes, once the evidence is due for submission, it should be sent on the
assessor webform with the following subject;
'
BREEAM Assessment Type - Building Data -
BREEAM Assessment Reference'
For example:
'BREEAM NC 2018 - Building Data - BREEAM-1234-5678'
29-Oct-2025 - Applicable to HQM One, HQM V6 and UKNCR V6.1
05 Nov 2024 - Wording clarified and link to the webform added
This replaces KBCN0695 for HQM.
Information correct as of 19thAugust 2026. Please see kb.breeam.com for the latest compliance information.