06 - Materials - BREEAM Knowledge Base

Definition – Reused in situ - KBCN1902

Definition A material qualifies as reused in situ where it meets all of the following:

It is removed from its original position or original application within the building.
It undergoes no more than minor processing that does not alter its fundamental nature (e.g. cleaning, cutting, fixing to other materials).
It is reinstalled in a different position or a different application within the building (or reused elsewhere within the project).

Exclusion Materials that remain in their original location and application throughout the works, including where they undergo minor processing such as cleaning, repair or redecoration, are considered as retained. These must be excluded from the Mat 03 calculator.

Early design phase LCA submission – Modified planning applications - KBCN1893

Requirement In the Mat 01 Methodology, M1.2 requires the early design phase LCA to be completed and submitted to BREEAM within 20 working days of submission of the planning application. Intent This requirement is in place to ensure that the LCA is carried out during the early design stages and can meaningfully influence material selection and key design decisions, before the planning application fixes significant aspects of the external specification. The timeframe of 20 working days post-planning submission is a concession to allow project teams to collate the LCA evidence for submission to BREEAM. Submission of the planning application In this context, this is the application that specifies and fixes the external products and materials that are considered in the LCA. By default, this is considered as the first application. However, it may also be:

A supplementary modified application, where a staged submission process is used

A replacement modified application, due to a major redesign

Where the requirement is applied to a supplementary or replacement application, the project team must provide additional evidence to demonstrate that the intent is met. Additional evidence

Confirmation of the date of the original planning application and the date of the modified application.

A description of what the modified application changes, with reference to the relevant submission documents.

Evidence that the modification significantly affects external products or materials specification, e.g. revised elevations, façade specification, external material schedules

Justification of how the early design LCA submitted in relation to the modified application was still capable of influencing relevant design decisions

Evidence requirements – responsible sourcing of materials at post-construction - KBCN1599

Whilst the UK BREEAM manuals are less prescriptive in the evidential requirements to allow flexibility, to ensure consistency across the schemes, it is expected that robust evidence should be provided to verify the source of any certified materials and how the assessor has confirmed the products and manufacturers used. Evidence supplied at post construction stage must reflect the completed building and confirm the responsibly sourced materials that have been procured and installed on the project. Supporting documentation is required to validate letters of confirmation or schedules of materials. Evidence provided could include proof of purchase, for example, invoices, delivery tickets, purchase orders or correspondence from suppliers. This may be an example for each material sourced, rather than every delivery ticket for instance. Alternatively, evidence of the use of the responsibly sourced materials may include as-built drawings, O&M documentation or site photographs.

30-Oct-2025 - Applicable to HQM V6 and UKNCR V6.1

GN18 BREEAM Recognised Responsible Sourcing Certification Schemes and BREEAM Scheme Applicability - KBCN0723

Latest version: v3.7, May 2023 BREEAM awards credits for responsibly sourcing construction products (typically under the Mat 03 issue) to encourage responsible product specification and procurement in construction. To achieve these credits, applicable specified products (as listed in the relevant technical manual) must be covered by an Environmental Management System (EMS) or a responsible sourcing certification scheme (RSCS) recognised by BREEAM. Guidance Note 18 (GN18) lists the responsible sourcing certifications schemes recognised by BREEAM along with the relevant summary scores to be used in BREEAM assessments. Download Guidance Note 18 Download Guidance Note 18 v2.0 (licensed assessors only - optional for projects registered prior to release of v3.0 in September 2016) View all Guidance Notes on BREEAM Projects (licensed assessors only)

21-Jul-2026 - Applicable to NC V6, NC V7, RFO V7

GN24 Demonstrating compliance with responsible sourcing requirements in BREEAM - KBCN0721

Latest version: v1.2, July 2026 Guidance Note 24 (GN24) provides additional guidance to assessors and specifiers on demonstrating compliance with the 'Measuring responsible sourcing' criteria in BREEAM (typically in Mat 03). It should be read in conjunction with the Technical Manual for the relevant assessment scheme. It covers:

How to deal with constituent products/materials including those with certification that is different from the overall product.
The precision required in estimating quantities:
- For the cut-off volume
- Of products/materials in the building (Route 2 only)
- Of different material categories in products/materials.
An example Route 2 calculation.
‘Broken chain’ situations.
How to treat building services.

Download Guidance Note 24 View all Guidance Notes on BREEAM Projects (licensed assessors only)

15-Jul-2026 - Updated version released (v1.2)

GN51 Guidance on LCA and embodied carbon calculations for Mat 01 in BREEAM V7 - KBCN1684

Latest version: v1.0, July 2026 Guidance Note 51 (GN51) provides supporting information for the new Mat 01 criteria in BREEAM V7. Its development is driven by the introduction of new credit allocation criteria for Mat 01. While the core principles of measuring and reporting a building's environmental performance through life cycle assessment (LCA) and benchmarking were introduced in BREEAM UK New Construction 2018, significant revisions have been made to align the criteria across BREEAM schemes and with existing LCA frameworks and methodologies. This guidance note explains the primary methodology for Mat 01, including minimum requirements and the scope of the LCA. Download Guidance Note 51 View all Guidance Notes on BREEAM Projects (licensed assessors only)

15-Jul-2026 - Updated version released (v1.0)

Life Cycle Assessment – Similar buildings approach (GN20 – Section 4) - KBCN1834

Where multiple buildings are included within the scope of a single BREEAM assessment following the Similar Buildings approach, in accordance with Section 4 of GN20, unless identical, each building must be assessed and reported separately within the LCA. Where all buildings are demonstrably identical in design and specification (and differ only in scale), a representative LCA approach may be used (see KBCN1890). Shared elements (e.g. substructure, external works, or building services serving multiple buildings) may be apportioned between buildings using a reasonable and transparent method (e.g. by gross internal area or other appropriate project-specific metric), in line with recognised industry approaches. For the purposes of BREEAM benchmarking under Mat 01: • The results submitted to the platform must represent a single building, not a combined site-wide result. • Where multiple buildings are included within an assessment, the worst-performing building (in kgCO₂e/m²) must be used for benchmarking in line with the Similar Buildings methodology (section 4.2 of GN20). Full evidence must be provided to demonstrate: • That all buildings within scope of the assessment have been included, with individual LCAs completed for each building, and • How results have been separated and, where relevant, how shared elements have been allocated.

Rationale: In line with Section 4.2 of GN20, BREEAM issues must be assessed for each individual building, with credits awarded based on the worst‑performing building for each assessment issue. The Similar Buildings approach therefore remains an individual‑building assessment methodology and does not constitute a site‑wide assessment, even where multiple buildings are included.

09.07.2026 Reference to KBCN1890 added

Life Cycle Assessment – Similar buildings with identical design (GN20 Section 4) – Representative LCA approach - KBCN1890

Where multiple buildings are substantially identical in design, construction and specification, and any differences are limited to scale, a representative LCA approach may be used instead of completing a full LCA for every building. Where buildings are not substantially identical, see KBCN1834. For the purposes of BREEAM benchmarking under Mat01:

A representative LCA and a single options appraisal may be applied across all buildings, provided that all specifications (including scoped elements) are consistent and carbon reduction measures are specification-driven rather than scale-dependent.
Robust justification and supporting evidence must be provided to confirm representativeness. The representative model should normally be the largest, most carbon-intensive, or otherwise demonstrably representative building within the development.
Results must be expressed in normalised form (e.g. kgCO₂e/m²) and demonstrated to be applicable across all units, with any variation in outcomes shown to be not materially significant (e.g. within ±10%).
Shared elements (e.g. substructure, external works, or building services serving multiple buildings) may be apportioned between buildings using a reasonable and transparent method (e.g. by gross internal area or other appropriate project-specific metric), in line with recognised industry approaches.

Demonstrating representativeness does not require full LCAs for additional units; proportionate methods such as parametric scaling of quantities or elemental intensity comparisons may be used to evidence that variation in normalised results is not materially significant. Where there is uncertainty regarding representativeness, a secondary check model for an additional unit is recommended to verify consistency of results.

Rationale: The representative LCA approach provides a proportionate means of assessing developments containing multiple highly similar buildings while maintaining confidence that reported results are representative of individual building performance. It is intended as a limited exception to the standard requirement for building-specific assessment.

Suitably qualified third-party verifiers – LCA training courses - KBCN1909

Purpose Mat 01 requires the third-party verifier to demonstrate knowledge of the LCA sector, including relevant standards, EPD programmes and regulations (see Definition: Suitably qualified third party). Examples of relevant LCA training courses Below are examples of training courses that BRE considers as meeting this knowledge requirement, and which can support assessors and verifiers in evidencing compliance:

This list is illustrative, not exhaustive. Completion of one of these courses is one way to evidence the knowledge requirement. It does not replace the other criteria under Suitably qualified third party. Equally, a verifier who has not completed one of the above courses may still qualify if they can otherwise demonstrate the required knowledge. Requesting an addition to this list Training providers or assessors wishing to propose a course for inclusion should contact breeam@bregroup.com and include BREEAM Relevant LCA training course – addition request in the Subject field.

Refurbishment and Fit Out / RFO Commercial V7 /

06 - Materials