4 Operational /
Information correct as of 16thSeptember 2021. Please see kb.breeam.com for the latest compliance information.
A new approach to BREEAM Quality Assurance- July 2021 update - KBCN1467
In April 2021 we implemented the first step towards introducing a new system for auditing first submissions of BREEAM assessments. For additional details on this new process, please refer to the original communication (Email sent on 25 March 2021 and the March 2021 Process Note
We would like to thank assessors for their co-operation in helping us to providing a better service.
What are the next steps?
We have now reviewed the data from this initial launch. Since 1 April 2021, 25% of first submissions have been halted, compared to our predicted halt rate of 30% – this is a reflection of the hard work of assessors to accommodate the changes made to BREEAM QA.
To continue to drive improvements in timescales and efficiency, we are now extending this approach to assessment resubmissions.
From 1 July 2021 resubmissions which receive high numbers of QA non-conformances (NCs) will be subject to additional outcomes, aligned with the set of trigger points detailed in the following table:
First QA submissions, as they have since 1 April 2021, will be halted and returned to the assessor for action if 12 or more non-conformances are encountered during the audit. (This does not apply to an assessor’s first ever submission on a given BREEAM scheme).
First resubmissions, (second submissions) will be subject to additional fees and potential mandatory training if 12 or more non-conformances are encountered, as detailed in the above table. Second resubmissions will receive no additional fees regardless of non-conformance numbers. Third resubmissions will incur additional fees and potential mandatory training should 4 or more non-conformances be encountered during an audit. As in the case of second resubmissions, fourth resubmissions and onwards will receive no additional fees, regardless of non-conformance numbers. This can be visualised in the following flow diagram:
The above fees are included in the latest Fee Sheet update which was announced to our network on the 20 May 2021. You can view the specific changes to the fees for each scheme, as well as updated fee sheets (FS036, revision 29 and FS021, revision 26) on BREEAM Projects.
This new system (i.e. possible additional fees and/or mandatory training) will affect BREEAM assessments which meet the following criteria:
- The assessment is under any BREEAM scheme.
- The Assessor has already completed at least one assessment under the BREEAM scheme.
- The first QA submission for the assessment is received by BRE on or after the 1 July 2021.
- At least one assessment resubmission meets one of the trigger points detailed in the above table and flow diagram. (Multiple resubmissions of one assessment can incur additional outcomes)
How we will support you on this
We will soon be introducing an assessor competency training course, which aims to support our assessors with multiple aspects of QA including referencing, presentation of evidence and clarification of the role of the assessor, the auditor and the Quality Assurance process. We wish to offer as much support on this as possible: please see our updated FAQs
, available on BREEAM Projects
(BREEAM Assessor Guidance Folder), and our Assessor Awareness Module
, delivered by the BRE Academy
A new approach to provide a better QA service - KBCN1449
For more than two decades the BREEAM Quality Assurance Team has been supporting the certification process by reviewing the documentation submitted by our assessors for UK and international projects. This process must balance many parameters and maintain the credibility of our BREEAM brand and the reputation of our clients. Furthermore, given the continuous development of the construction industry and our BREEAM standards, BREEAM QA has had to evolve accordingly.
Why are we making these changes?
Over recent years, it has become evident that we need to make certain improvements to how we operate, for the benefit of our assessor network and all parties involved.
This is clearly demonstrated by the large number of resubmissions and assessments that generate a high number of non-conformances we receive.
The BREEAM QA process should not be used as a checking service.
We need to ensure that the standards are not compromised. Since we are only reviewing a sample of the assessments and the issues within, there is a need to elevate the quality of all assessments to an acceptable level.
Based on our data, collected over several months, the ratio of resubmissions to first submissions is 3:2 (60% resubmissions vs 40% initial submission of the overall assessments received). When considering the overall number of non-conformances, almost a quarter of all assessment submissions generate more than 7 findings.
The data shows the need to ensure that the quality of the assessments is uplifted and the whole QA team's time is used productively, reviewing assessments which meet the expected level of quality.
By increasing productivity and the number of qualified auditors, the BREEAM QA Team has reduced the QA timescales from 8 weeks in Summer 2020 down to 4 weeks by late Autumn 2020. As part of our continued drive to maintain and improve the QA turnaround times, we are now putting in place a new process, which we feel has many benefits. This new approach will contribute to maintaining and further reducing our timescales.
What changes are being made?
April 2021, submissions for all BREEAM Schemes will be audited as follows:
This is subject to the following two trigger points. If either is met, the audit will be halted and feedback issued. The assessor must then update the entire assessment, implementing the feedback throughout.
- There are 12 Non-Conformances (a combination of Minor and up to 2 Major NCs)
- There are 3 Major NCs – the audit will be reviewed by a senior member of the Quality Assurance Team. If all the Major NCs are confirmed, the audit will be halted, as above.
Note: To account for newly qualified assessors, the above approach will not be applied to an assessor’s first audit under a given BREEAM Scheme.
When the assessment is resubmitted, it is expected that all the QA feedback be actioned. The NCs are re-audited along with the remaining issues. Where the number of NCs after the re-audit remains unacceptably high, BRE will implement charges to such resubmissions.
When does this come into effect?
The new approach will be effective from 1st
April 2021. There are no additional requirements for submissions, other than those described above. These changes are not expected to affect most assessments; especially those which are on reduced checking levels.
This approach is intended to reward consistently good submissions.
How we will support you?
In our December Process Note, we outlined our plan to keep QA timescales low, along with our aim to reduce them even further. We aim to consistently maintain those and fulfil our promise to all relevant parties.
We have compiled a document including several Frequently Asked Questions
, to help answer any queries that may arise from the implementation of this new approach.
Furthermore, our team has produced an Assessor Awareness Module, where additional guidance is provided on the impacts of low-quality assessments and what can be done for these to be improved. This free module is offered for free by BRE Academy
Addition of credits between stages - KBCN0512
Where credits previously not awarded at the Design Stage are subsequently achieved at the Post Construction stage, these can also be added in, provided sufficient justification and supporting evidence is in place.
Full supporting evidence, as required in the technical manual, must be sourced and provided for audit when requested.
Addition of credits between submissions - KBCN0506
Where appropriate, additional credits may be added to an assessment between QA audits, provided sufficient justification and supporting evidence is in place.
Full supporting evidence, as required in the technical manual, must be sourced and provided for audit when requested. The BREEAM QA team must be informed, via cover letter/email, that additional credits have been awarded. It is highly likely that any additional credits will then be reviewed as part of the QA of the resubmission.
Amendment of BREEAM certificates - KBCN0507
All BREEAM certificates are issued are based on the information included within the assessment at the point of certification. Where this information is incorrect and an amendment is required, the certificate amendment fee as per FS036 will be applicable.
An email must be sent to email@example.com
stating the report reference and outlining the amendment.
For domestic schemes where a separate certificate is issued for each dwelling, the email must highlight if the amendment is applicable to one or all of the certificates.
Assessment and evidence record keeping - KBCN0521
The licensed organisation is responsible for implementing and maintaining internal quality management procedures for record keeping. Licensed organisations are required to keep all documentation, materials and data (i.e. evidence) associated with all assessments conducted by them for a period of ten years following the submission of the report to BRE Global. BRE Global reserves the right to contact licensed assessor organisations at any point during this ten year period to verify the information/assessment, as required by the rules of our accreditation in cases where certification is challenged. Where requested, the licensee will supply BRE Global with all documents necessary to audit the performance of the assessment.
Please note, submitting copies of evidence to BRE Global for quality assurance and certification purposes, whether hard copies or an online upload via BREEAM Projects or other third party BREEAM recognised software, does not release assessors from their obligation to store records of assessment evidence for ten years. BRE Global will use evidence provided by the licensed assessor for the purpose of making a certification decision, we do not keep records of all assessment evidence for ten years once a certification has been made.
Assessment submission via third party FTP upload - KBCN0524
Assessors wishing to make use of third party FTP (file transfer protocol) upload websites for sending assessments and supporting evidence must be aware of the following requirements:
- All submissions must be to the BREEAM inbox, firstname.lastname@example.org, and must be downloadable by any individual in the BREEAM team, rather than ‘locked’ to only one person/account
- The download email should clearly state the assessment report reference number
- Where possible please ensure that there is no time limit for the download. Where this is not possible, a minimum of 30 days is required and the download email should clearly set out the time limit
- Where a password is required, this should be sent in a separate standalone email to the main BREEAM inbox, also clearly referencing the assessment report reference
Where submissions are made not meeting the above requirements, the assessor may be asked to resubmit the assessment.
Assessors are responsible for the security of their data and documentation, including that submitted to BRE Global via third party FTP websites. BRE Global will not accept liability for any issues occurring (including lost or stolen data) as a result of the use of such websites.
BREEAM AP/Sustainability Champion validity - KBCN0527
For credits to be awarded for the use of, and the BREEAM AP/Sustainability Champion to appear on the Certificate, the assessor must ensure that the BREEAM AP/Sustainability Champion qualification was valid at the time of appointment, and maintained throughout their involvement in the relevant project stages.
Qualified status is maintained through membership of the relevant schemes, for example the BREEAM AP scheme, and listing on Green Book Live. Evidence demonstrating their status must be collected by the assessor and provided for QA purposes.
Where an individual’s status has lapsed during the relevant period, or the project has continued for an extended period of time without their involvement, the credits cannot be awarded and they cannot be listed on the BREEAM Certificate.
BREEAM In-Use QA and Certification explained - KBCN0523
The BREEAM In-Use (BiU) certification scheme was introduced in 2009. Since then we have certified many assessments by a large international network of dedicated and professional assessors. As the success of BREEAM In-Use grows it is appropriate that we review and, where necessary, update the scheme’s quality assurance and certification procedures. This ensures we can collectively maintain and enhance its robustness, improve quality and align with evolving international standards to which we seek accreditation.
To support this aim we introduced the following changes to the quality assurance and certification process from February 2015:
- Audit prior to certification: Assessments selected for technical audit are only certified after successfully passing the quality assurance process. This reduces the risk to assessors, their clients and BRE Global of a certificate withdrawal shortly after certification, where the assessment fails a quality assurance audit.
- Audit selection: Technical audit selection is linked to assessor performance on previous assessments, ensuring that assessors who consistently demonstrate competent and robust performance have fewer assessments selected for audit (subject to a minimum level of selection for risk management purposes).
- Audit feedback: There is a formal quality assurance form to ensure clarity and consistency of audit feedback, allowing assessors to easily understand where corrective action is required prior to certification.
If one of your assessments is selected for technical audit, you will be informed of this immediately after submission for certification. At this point you will be requested to send in supporting evidence at your earliest convenience. Assessments that have not been selected for a technical audit will undergo administrative checks only, which BRE Global will undertake within two working days and certification will follow thereafter. The audit programme is designed in such a way that an assessor performing to the required standard can expect a significant majority of their BiU assessments to be selected for administrative checks only, and therefore typically certification will occur within two days for most submissions.
Certification of those assessments selected for a technical audit will occur after the assessment has passed the audit process, so the timescale for this will depend on both BRE Global and the assessor. We will inform assessors of the timescale in which they can expect audit feedback for a specific assessment upon acknowledgement of receipt of their submission. We will also publish a service level that we will work to in this respect, so that assessors and their client have a degree of certainty over when they can expect such feedback and, subject to passing the audit, certification.
We believe this process for the scheme assists BRE Global and assessors in promoting the independence, robustness and integrity of the scheme to their clients, who will have greater confidence that the certified rating of their asset is an accurate and verified representation of its performance. In turn, this helps us to further differentiate the BiU product in the international market place and increase uptake of the scheme.
The Live Chat service is provided to assessors as a means of contacting the BREEAM Team.
For QA queries, we welcome closing out of very quick and straightforward audit findings through the service, however this should only be in the case of small numbers of findings which can be obviously and objectively closed out quickly (e.g. 2-3 findings maximum, each taking less than 5 minutes discussion).
For Licensing and Registration queries you can contact the team instead of sending an email or phoning, the types of queries that can be answered through live chat are detailed in the June 2018 Process Note. Licence and registration applications cannot be submitted via Live Chat - these should be submitted through the current processes.
For technical queries, this is not intended to replace email submissions for complex technical queries, which often require research and consultation within BREEAM to resolve, but should be viewed as an alternative to a telephone hotline, where assessors can seek a quick clarification or reassurance on technical matters. If you have already submitted a written query to BREEAM Technical and are awaiting a response, please do not chase this up on Live Chat. For further guidance, please refer to the September 2018 Process Note.
For all types of queries, we expect conversations to last no more than 20 minutes maximum. In order to provide this service whilst still delivering BREEAM services to the assessor network, it is unlikely that we will be able to have conversations lasting much longer than this time. Please do not be surprised or offended if at around that time, the person you are speaking to needs to draw the conversation to a close.
Where the person (or team) you require speaking to is not available due to not being at their desk or any other reason, we will inform you and where possible let you know when they are next likely to be available. Please be understanding of this - it is important you speak to the right person, but there is always a reasonable chance they are not available.
BRE Global reserves the right to suspend or withdraw this service at any time and without prior notice. It is offered for free at the current time and does not constitute any part of the contractual service delivered by BRE Global as part of the licence agreement.
Where assessors are found to misuse the service (including but not limited to: Consistently raising inappropriate queries, going over the 20 minute maximum time on a frequent basis, allowing others to login as the assessor or being rude and/or abusive towards those answering your queries), the Live Chat service will be withdrawn permanently from that individual.
BREEAM Recognised Software and BREEAM Projects - KBCN0514
BREEAM Recognised Software may be used to compile assessment data and evidence for submission for schemes which must be submitted via BREEAM Projects, at the current time.
If you wish to use one of these, the referencing document and a zip file containing the evidence from the approved system must then be uploaded within the BREEAM Projects assessment tool.
Browse button not showing when uploading evidence - KBCN1117
If when you go to upload evidence using the BREEAM Projects Report/Evidence upload facility and the browse button is missing, you will need to update your Adobe Flash Player to an up to date version.
To update your Adobe Flash Player you will need to update through your browser settings or system control panel depending on which browser you use. You may need to contact your system administrator to make these changes.
If the assessment is compatible with using a BREEAM Projects online tool then all evidence and scoring and reporting tools should be uploaded within the BREEAM Projects online tool for the assessment - which does not require Adobe Flash Player.
If you have installed Adobe and the browse button is still not showing follow the instructions is KBNC1163
. If your project is not compatible with BREEAM Projects online tool (see KBCN1069
) then evidence can be uploaded using third party FTP sites. Please see KBCN0524
for our requirements when using third party FTP sites.
Browse button on upload facility not showing - KBCN1163
If after following instructions in KBCN1117
the Browse button is still not showing you will need to change your site security settings.
Instructions below are for Google Chrome, if you are using IE or Firefox then update the site security settings for these browsers through the settings options.
If using Google chrome go to the page that is missing the browse button and click on ‘Secure’ in the address bar. Then click on Flash dropdown which will either say ‘Ask’ or ‘Block’ and change to ‘Allow’ – if flash options don’t appear then you will find it under ‘site settings’.
Once changed to 'Allow' you can click the cross to close the settings and the page should have a pop up which says 'Reload'.
Reload the page and the browse button should appear.
Changing from Design Stage to Post Construction between QA submissions - KBCN0503
It is acceptable for an assessment type to be changed from interim ('Design Stage') to final ('Post Construction') between submissions for QA, i.e. after feedback has been received by the assessor from the BREEAM QA team and before resubmission.
When the assessor wishes to do this, the BREEAM QA Team must be informed in advance of resubmitting the assessment. It must also be stated clearly within the cover email/upload notes alongside the resubmission.
Upon resubmission of the assessment, a new audit will be carried out due to the change in stage. Therefore, the assessment will be subject to first submission timescales and additional certification fee (in line with FS036) will be applicable.
Compiling of Site Inspection Reports at the Post Construction stage - KBCN0517
BRE strongly advises that assessors should have a formal, written site inspection report which will act as standalone evidence (separate from the BREEAM assessment), and that this should be referenced as evidence for the applicable credits. The report should contain full details of what has been witnessed on site and which credits/criteria the particular comments relate to, and may include copies of photographs (which are required for many credits as evidence in any case).
It is preferable to produce a separate record of the site visit, which can stand as evidence to back up the assessment report.
Where an assessor uses their site visit as evidence of compliance they will need to record the following information outlined below as a minimum in a site inspection report:
- Date of visit
- Assessor name and contact details
- Project details
- Unique reference number
- Issues/criteria inspected
- Details of state of compliance (written notes and/or photographic evidence)
- Recommendations made and shared with the client/relevant parties, where appropriate
The assessor may feel that it is desirable to record information above and beyond this list, and would be encouraged to do so wherever they feel it is appropriate or necessary to confirm compliance.
Compliance: Conflicts of interest for the BREEAM assessor - KBCN0107
The assessor can be someone within the design team or work for the same company as the design team member(s) but the assessor must identify and manage any potential conflicts of interest. The assessor should also make BRE Global aware of the situation so that, should it prove appropriate, the certification report can be escalated to a more detailed level of quality assurance checking.
If the assessor is a member of the company who are producing evidence to demonstrate compliance, there must be clear separation of the roles and the BREEAM/HQM assessor must not be personally responsible for producing such evidence.
BREEAM/HQM is a 3rd party certification scheme. Therefore, it is important to avoid any conflicts of interest between those producing evidence and those awarding credits to ensure the robustness of the certification process.
Confirmation of version / year of technical standards - KBCN0519
When providing evidence of compliance it is important for design teams to clearly refer to the version and / or year of the standard being complied with for an assessment.
The issue / release / adoption of standards sets the requirements appropriate at the time of publication of the BREEAM scheme documentation. A standard may be updated in between BREEAM re-issues and updates so the standard cited in the requirements or the most current version of a standard can be applied. This applies to standards such as National (e.g. British) Standards, HTM documents, Environment Agency and Policy Planning Guidelines etc.
Where the current version of the standard differs notably from the cited standard in the manual, it is the role of the assessor or design team to verify that it is equivalent or more robust than the original requirement.
Evidence failing to demonstrate this will be result in raising of a non-conformance within QA and will delay certification.
KBCN0747 Equivalent standard use
23/08/17 Merged with “Superseded standards and evidence referenced” KBCN0453
Conflict of Interest statements - KBCN0520
If the assessor believes there is or may be potential for a conflict of interest then the first step to managing it is to declare it to BRE Global, along with any measures proposed or taken to manage the potential conflict. BRE Global can then confirm or advise steps that need to be taken by the relevant parties (including ourselves) to maintain the objectivity of the assessment and its outcome.
The assessor should inform BRE Global of any potential conflict at the registration stage of assessment; or at the appropriate time thereafter when the potential conflict becomes apparent and before the assessment is submitted for a certification decision
Licensed assessors can and often will need to advise clients, project teams and asset owners/managers on whether one or more proposed solutions comply and how to interpret assessment criteria for the purpose of determining, designing or proposing compliant solutions. This type of advice does not necessarily constitute a conflict of interest, but assessors should be mindful in doing so that it does not lead to one.
When submitting the assessment to the BREEAM QA Team the assessor must submit a signed statement confirming the roles undertaken by the assessor/assessor organisation and how any potential conflicts of interest have been managed. A statement confirming that there was no conflict of interest is not sufficient.
In such circumstances the assessment and evidence submitted may be subject to closer scrutiny. Where BRE Global has unresolved concerns relating to the potential conflicts of interest, additional measure may be imposed to verify the integrity of the submitted assessment.
COVID-19 Bulletin 1: Alterations to BREEAM assessment requirements as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic - KBCN1395
We appreciate that, during this challenging period, complete adherence to all our standard operating and assessment requirements may not be possible.
Following our initial guidance on March the 19th, this Bulletin aims to assist assessors, and our wider stakeholders, with continuing to conduct assessments in a robust manner whilst also taking a practical view in light of the COVID-19 global crisis and its impacts on many territories.
It may be necessary for us to update this guidance as circumstances change. We will inform assessors via the process note as and when such updates are made however please do check back prior to nearing the submission of an assessment to ensure that you are following the most current guidance.
Readers are also advised that this guidance is only applicable in situations where social distancing rules relating to the COVID-19 pandemic are in place and must be implemented in line with the prevailing government/relevant authority advice on social distancing, and health and safety.
- Submitting assessments and certification:
As the response to the COVID-19 pandemic currently varies between geographic regions and territories, assessors should provide an account of the particular circumstances of the place and nature of the assessment within their report.
Provided assessors follow all relevant guidance outlined in this Bulletin as a means of demonstrating compliance in as robust and thorough a manner possible, Interim and Final Certificates will be issued as normal, without a caveat.
- Gathering evidence for site assessments:
The status of construction, and other sites is variable; some are dormant, others active and operational with some cases of priority works and completions still taking place. Furthermore, some stakeholders may be having to self-isolate during a critical point of the assessment. As such, it may be difficult, or impossible, for assessors to gain full access to conduct a site assessment.
In cases where an assessor cannot personally visit or gain access to the site, they can appoint a suitable individual, for example a main contractor or asset manager, to undertake a formal site assessment on their behalf.
The appointed individual would be expected to provide a robust account to the assessor of evidence in place of their own site assessment report. We would expect the report to contain photographs and/or virtual tour stills from the building and be signed off by both the appointed individual and assessor.
For those assessment issues relating to external spaces beyond the site, we will accept stills/images from Google Street View (or equivalent), provided it is demonstrated that such evidence is current.
Where the above options are not possible, for example when the site has been closed, for HQM, BREEAM New Construction and Refurbishment schemes, in place of a site assessment report, we will accept ‘as built drawings’ and written confirmation from the design team and main contractors that the requirements have been met. This confirmation should be specific and adhere to other evidence requirement principles.
- BREEAM in Use re-certification:
If a site assessment is not possible, either for the assessor or a suitable individual, desk-based evidence will be accepted for the purposes of BIU re-certification where:
- evidence demonstrates that the criteria are being met as far as possible without a site assessment.
- there is a firm commitment for a follow-up site inspection to be carried out when it is safe to do so, in line with local government guidance on COVID-19.
- Timing of workshops, testing and other subsidiary evidence submissions:
Given the widespread availability of remote communication technologies, it is generally possible to undertake the majority of activities relating to our assessment criteria without the need for face-to-face contact or site assessments.
However, we appreciate that this won’t be the case in all instances and that some projects may be experiencing delays in some areas whilst other aspects may still be moving forward. Development and improvements are rarely linear at the best of times.
With respect to workshops, the key consideration is that they take place at a time when they have a meaningful impact and achieve the aim of the criteria. BREEAM New Construction and RFO schemes typically set timelines based on the RIBA Work Stages. Evidence of remote workshops taking place outside of the prescribed timescales will be accepted provided it can be demonstrated that the aim of the issue is still achieved.
With respect to indoor air quality testing, where possible, the construction programme should allow time for the indoor air quality testing to be undertaken post-construction/pre-occupancy, in line with the BREEAM criteria. However, where it can be demonstrated that this is not possible, due to restrictions relating to COVID-19, it is permissible to undertake the indoor air quality testing post-occupancy, as follows:
- In order to demonstrate compliance, the results must still meet the BREEAM performance targets set for post-construction/pre-occupancy testing.
- Where certification is sought prior to testing, robust evidence that this will be undertaken as early as possible and any defects remedied to achieve compliance must be provided.
- Projects following this approach do so at their own risk and on the understanding that the performance targets may not be achieved due to factors relating to occupancy. As such, additional remediation measures may be required to achieve compliance.
- In this situation, the advice of the Indoor Air Quality Consultant should be sought and followed.
With respect to subsidiary, third party assessments such as ecological site inspections or audits, desktop surveys based on available information (e.g. planning surveys, agent’s reports, photographs, Google Earth), can be used as an alternative provided there is enough material for a confident recommendation and/or outcome to be achieved.
If the COVID-19 restrictions are lifted prior to Final Certification and it is safe to do so, this must then be followed by a site inspection/audit to verify any assumptions made and gather any missing survey information. The desktop survey and site report should then be submitted as evidence.
Third party consultants should also work in line with any health and safety guidance issued by relevant professional bodies.
We hope that you find this helpful. It is intended as general guidance, however if assessors encounter situations which differ substantially and/or are unsure how/whether this guidance is applicable, please seek advice from BREEAM by submitting a query on the webform
Deadline for resubmission following QA - KBCN0510
Assessments which have not achieved certification after the first submission, must be resubmitted within 6 months of the date the QA feedback from BRE Global was issued. Where assessments are resubmitted later than 6 months, the assessment will be subject to full certification fees again.
Where an extension to the 6 months is required, the assessor must email email@example.com
in order that this can be considered and an extended deadline agreed where exceptional circumstances exist.
If the assessment is resubmitted prior to the 6 month date but is not audited until this date has passed and does not pass the QA process, the final submission must be received within 14 days of QA feedback being issued.
This does not in any way affect the validity of an assessment’s registrations.
Design and post-construction stage evidence - KBCN00038
Both design (DS) and post-construction stage (PCS) evidence are required for a post construction review (PCR) or post construction assessment (PCA). It is, however, possible to provide only PCS evidence where the DS evidence is completely superseded and unnecessary.
To comply with the principles of robustness and completeness, both DS and PCS evidence have to be submitted at PCR or PCA unless the PCS evidence makes the DS evidence obsolete.
Disclosure of issues selected for auditing - KBCN0819
We are often asked by assessors to identify the issues and credits we check during a quality assurance audit.
As with similar certification schemes, BREEAM does not notify assessors about what proportion of the requirements/issues are or have been checked; it could be all of them or just some. Over the course of a number of audits all, or a significant majority of issues will be checked and, via raising non-conformances where they are found, the assessor should gain confidence that their approach to the application of the standard is the correct one, without compromising the independence or randomised nature of the auditing process (by revealing all items checked in every audit).
Furthermore, to identify the issues audited and confirm those without non-conformities as ‘OK’ would imply that everything provided and referenced as part of that issue was being confirmed by BRE Global as compliant. This would not necessarily be the case and could pose further problems in future assessments. Finally, in the past we experienced some assessors using the QA audits as a form of ‘checking service’ and would submit assessments before they were complete and at a stage ready to be certified. This undermined the purpose of the QA audit process and contributed to delays in QA turnaround times. Maintaining the anonymity of the issues audited we feel is the best way to check that assessments have applied BREEAM in accordance with the requirements of the scheme and, in the long term, maintain the standards of assessment.
The assessor can expect the auditor to provide positive feedback regarding aspects of the assessment process that have been carried out well (within the feedback section at the beginning of the QA form). This will not be issue-specific feedback but it will draw upon examples from within the assessment being audited. We will also feedback on QA-related issues to the wider assessor network, through events like the Customer Liaison Workshop, BRE Academy webinars, the Forum and Knowledge Base. This feedback is not linked to specific assessments, but highlights trends, common issues and pitfalls identified via the QA of particular BREEAM issues, credits, criteria and evidence. This will, we hope, help assessors in evaluating their approach to credits, foster further good practice and quicker audits.
Evidence: Final design/’as-built’ drawings as evidence - KBCN0393
Where drawings are not clearly marked to indicate their 'as-built' status, additional evidence would need to be provided by the design team to confirm the drawings represent the completed development and that there have been no changes relevant to the BREEAM/HQM assessment. This could, for example, be a written confirmation from the architect or the contractor, as appropriate.
Evidence: Post construction assessment evidence - KBCN0407
For the purposes of robustness and completeness, both design AND post-construction stage evidence is required for a post construction assessment. However, it is possible to provide only post construction stage (PCS) evidence where it is clear that this completely supersedes the design stage (DS) evidence and renders it unnecessary.
Evidence: Types of evidence required to demonstrate compliance with BREEAM - KBCN0402
The list of evidence details the typical types of information that the Assessor needs to collate to assess compliance against the requirements of a BREEAM issue. The evidence type listed against each requirement is not exclusive and other types and forms of evidence (listed or not listed in the table) can be used to demonstrate compliance against a BREEAM requirement.
Key to demonstrating compliance with the BREEAM requirements is that the Assessor has used, and references, an auditable trail of evidence, regardless of the form that evidence takes in relation to each BREEAM requirement. For example: if, for a particular BREEAM requirement, the list asks for a letter from the client confirming compliance, but compliance can or has been demonstrated via a building specification then the Assessor can reference that piece of evidence as demonstrating compliance and does not need a letter. However, the Assessor must confirm acceptance by the Technical team in advance of the certificate submission to avoid findings being raised in the Quality Assurance process.
Please note that the BREEAM team is unable to advise Assessors whether a particular piece of evidence demonstrates compliance as this is the Assessor’s responsibility. The BREEAM team will not fail the QA of a certification report on the basis that evidence referenced in the report, confirming compliance with the assessment criteria, is not an identical type to that outlined in the schedule of evidence. For further information please refer to the ‘BREEAM evidence requirements’ section or ‘Appendices’ section in the relevant Technical Manual.
Fast Track QA - KBCN0518
For assessments where certification is required very quickly (i.e. days or a couple of weeks), it is possible to apply for our Fast Track QA service. If the application is accepted, the service guarantees feedback within 3 full working days for first submissions, and 2 full working days for resubmissions, from the date that acceptance of the assessment under the Fast Track scheme is sent by BRE Global.
The service can be applied for at any time during the audit process, and covers a total of 3 submissions, i.e. a first submission and 2 resubmissions, or if applied for after first submission feedback has already been issued, 3 resubmissions.
When resubmitting an assessment, it is the responsibility of the assessor to ensure that BRE is clearly notified that the fast track assessment has been resubmitted by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org
and if utilising the upload function within BREEAM Projects/Extranet, the 'Fast Track' option must be ticked. Where this does not happen, feedback is likely to be delayed with no crediting of the additional fees paid.
To apply for the service, a completed and signed application form
must be submitted to email@example.com
, after submitting both the assessment and supporting documentation. An application will not be confirmed as accepted until all three items are received.
Requests for the service will be accepted or declined based on availability at the time of application, as the service is operated outside of regular working hours to ensure there is no negative impact upon assessments not requesting the service. However, if an application is declined, the assessor can reapply any time up until feedback is issued.
Multiple applications covering initial submission under the same assessor and same scheme are unlikely to be accepted on the same day.
File Formats: Assessment and Calculator tools - KBCN0513
To ensure that all assessments are received in full with no text or sections missing, all BREEAM UK New Construction 2011 and 2014 and BREEAM International New Construction 2013 and 2016 assessments, which are not being completed within BREEAM Projects, should be submitted in their original (Excel) format.
Assessment/calculator tools (including those applicable to earlier version), originally provided to assessors in Microsoft Excel format, should also not be converted to PDF before issuing to BREEAM for quality assurance. BREEAM 2008 (or earlier) assessment reports may still be submitted in PDF format.
Getting the referencing right - KBCN0522
When referencing evidence it is the role of the assessor to demonstrate how the credits for each issue have been awarded. The assessor must therefore provide their thought process and clear location references (i.e. page and/or clause numbers, etc.) that give the auditor or any other reviewer of the assessment a clear auditable trail as to how each individual criterion within an issue has been addressed.
A good example: "Section 3.2.5 (page 23) of Ref 46 shows compliance with Criterion 11a"
A poor example: "Ref 46 shows compliance with Hea 04"
, or, "Ref 46 shows compliance with Criteria 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8"
For more detailed guidance on getting reporting and referencing right, we encourage you to view this online webinar
within BREEAM Projects.
Green Lease Agreement – reference to the technical manual - KBCN0881
The technical manual includes criteria, intended for the guidance and interpretation of licensed BREEAM assessors. It does not generally provide detailed practical solutions to meet the criteria.
In the BREEAM UK New Construction 2011 and International New Construction 2013 schemes, Shell only/Shell & core assessments included provision for demonstrating compliance for fit-out items using a Green Lease Agreement (GLA).
The future tenant and their design team should not have to rely on a licensed BREEAM assessor to assist them in interpreting the GLA to achieve a compliant fit-out. Specifications for achieving compliance must therefore be explicitly included within the GLA, with reference to the relevant BREEAM criteria, to allow the fit-out team to understand exactly what is required.
A compliant Green Lease Agreement must be a robust alternative to the actual implementation or installation of fit-out measures. A Green Lease Agreement which relies solely on reference to the BREEAM Technical manual is not considered a robust solution.
How to start a PCR in BREEAM Projects - KBCN1167
When completing a post construction review (PCR) of a certified design stage assessment it is not necessary to submit a new assessment registration. PCRs are a review assessment of a certified design stage and therefore do not require a new assessment registration. Do not register PCRs through the online registration system otherwise a non-refundable registration fee will be charged.
Assessors can start PCRs of their own certified Design stage assessments through BREEAM Projects
. Some schemes are not available in BREEAM Projects please see KBCN1069
for details. If the scheme is not compatible to start a PCR in BREEAM Projects please follow instructions in KBCN076
Firstly, find the certified Design stage in your Projects folders. This will either be in a Project folder you have created or it will be in the Project folder titled ‘MY ASSESSMENTS NOT IN A PROJECT’. Click on the Grey cross to expand the folder.
Find the assessment and click on it to open the design stage. It should have a green tick at the end which shows ‘Certified’.
There will be a box on the first page of the DS assessment which shows the previous ‘QA Result’
Scroll to the bottom of the assessment page and a 'Start PCR' button should be visible.
You will be taken to start PCR page with three simple questions.
Answer the three questions and click Start PCR.
A new PCR assessment will be added and you will receive an email confirming the number.
If you cannot find the design stage in your Projects folders then it may have been certified by a different assessor or a different licensed assessor company. In this instance please contact BREEAM Registrations team on BREEAM@bre.co.uk
or on Live Chat and the team will be able to start the PCR and assign it your account (if the relevant scheme licence is valid).
Please note that you do not have access to any assessments for schemes where you do not hold a valid licence and therefore would not be able to start assessing at PCR stage.
Please see other compliance note regarding the process of submitting PCRs under schemes that use the excel scoring and reporting tool and are not compatible with BREEAM Projects.
How to submit an assessment on BREEAM Projects – What versions use BREEAM Projects - KBCN1183
For all assessments other than Code for Sustainable Homes and BREEAM In Use you should find your assessment using BREEAM Projects
rather than the BREEAM extranet as this will automatically provide the correct route for submitting an assessment.
There are three ways to submit assessments for QA and certification directly on BREEAM Projects.
1 – Full online reporting functionality
For newer scheme versions you can use the full functionality of BREEAM Projects as your assessment reporting tool. The versions that have use of the full functionality are as follows:
- BREEAM UK New Construction (2014 & 2018) – excluding Simple Buildings and Bespoke developed criteria assessments
- BREEAM International New Construction (2016) – excluding Bespoke developed criteria assessments
- BREEAM UK Refurbishment & Fit-Out (2014) – excluding Bespoke developed criteria assessments
- BREEAM International Refurbishment & Fit-Out (2014) – excluding Bespoke developed criteria assessments
- BREEAM UK Domestic Refurbishment (2012 & 2014)
- Home Quality Mark (2015 Beta & HQM ONE)
- BREEAM Infrastructure New Construction (2015)
2 – Using BREEAM Projects reporting tool as an upload tool for Scoring and Reporting tool and evidence
For older, legacy schemes it is possible to submit your assessment using BREEAM projects as an upload tool (instead of using the extranet upload) where the assessment has been completed using an MS Excel scoring and reporting tool. It is not necessary to use the BREEAM extranet upload form for the scheme versions detailed below.
Scoring & Reporting tool upload functionality:
- BREEAM UK New Construction (2011, 2014 & 2018) – excluding Simple Buildings and Bespoke developed criteria assessments
- BREEAM UK New Construction (2008) – all standard types, excluding Bespoke developed criteria, Fire Stations, Multi-Residential, Visitor Centres and Whitbread Premier Inn
- BREEAM International New Construction (2009, 2010 & 2013) – excluding Bespoke developed criteria assessments
For any of the above types please see KBCN1184
– How to submit on BREEAM Projects using a Scoring and Reporting tool upload
3 – Basic upload form
For all the older schemes and the exceptions above (Code for Sustainable Homes and BREEAM In-Use) you should use BREEAM Projects to submit your assessment and evidence rather than using the BREEAM extranet upload form.
BREEAM Projects will show ‘Submit BREEAM Report/QA Evidence’ for any of the types listed below and a form similar to the BREEAM extranet form will open but with many details automatically completed.
Basic upload form schemes, types and versions:
- BREEAM Communities
- BREEAM UK NC Simple Buildings
- BREEAM Bespoke Developed Criteria Projects – UK & International (NC & RFO)
- BREEAM Data Centres 2010
- BREEAM UK NC Fire Stations, Multi-Residential, Visitor Centres and Whitbread Premier Inn 2008 versions
- NSO BREEAM Schemes
- All Pre-2008 BREEAM Schemes
For any of the above types please see KBCN1185
– How to submit on BREEAM Projects using the upload form.
How to submit on BREEAM Projects using a Scoring and Reporting Tool upload (MS Excel) - KBCN1184
Details of the different schemes, types and versions that can be submitted using a pre-filled MS excel scoring and reporting tool can be found in KBCN1183
Simple three step instructions:
Step 1) On the ‘Assessment Details’ tab click on ‘Upload assessment spreadsheet’ and browse and submit.
Step 2) On the ‘Building/development details’ tab click on ‘Upload and link evidence’ and browse and submit. Very large zip files may take a while to upload. The document will appear once uploaded
Step 3) On the ‘Submit’ tab at the top – complete the submission details and declaration and click ‘Submit assessment to QA’.
- Find the assessment within your project folders and click on the assessment to open the assessment in BREEAM Projects (it will have a green tick in one of the dots)
- You may get a screen to choose Design stage (interim) or Post Construction (Final, as-built) – if so, choose Design (Interim) if you plan to complete separate Design stage and then Post Construction Review (PCR) or choose Post Construction if you are planning on assessing straight to Post Construction (PCA). For PCRs please see KBCN1167
- The assessment will open on the Assessment Details page. Scroll to the bottom of the page and click ‘Upload assessment spreadsheet’
- Save a copy of the completed MS Excel S&R tool and ensure that the requirements are met
- the BREEAM Assessment reference number stated within the tool is entered in the correct format (BREEAM-XXXX-XXXX)
- the BREEAM Assessment reference number stated within the tool matches the reference for the assessment you are uploading into
- the scheme type stated within the tool matches that for the registration
- Click ‘Browse’ and select the saved S&R tool
- Then click submit. BREEAM Projects will read the tool and upload the relevant information into the assessment. For schemes where the full online reporting tool is not available (all versions other than UK NC 2014 and 2018) it is not possible to make any changes to the issues, credits and scoring. Any changes should be made in the MS Excel tool and uploaded again.
- Click on ‘BREEAM Rating’ and check the rating and score matches the rating and score in the S&R tool. If they do not match please include this as a note in the comment section on submission
- To upload the evidence click on ‘Building/development details’ tab (sometimes known as ‘Initial Details’) and scroll to the bottom of the page and click on ‘Upload and link evidence’
- Select ‘upload new evidence’ and complete the Document type. For Zip files of evidence select ‘Other’, enter a brief document title e.g. ‘Evidence Zip file’ and browse to find the file and click save. Very large zip files may take a while to upload, you can see the percentage upload in the bottom left hand side of your screen. Do not refresh the page while it is uploading. Once uploaded it will appear in the evidence list.
- Go to the ‘Submit’ tab at the top of the screen and complete the questions regarding Fast Track, Translation, Purchase Order. If you have any comments or notes for the QA team regarding the submission then enter them in the comments box.
- Optional: Generate a draft certificate – to check the address details and project team member details. Please note this function currently is only applicable for the first submission
- Complete the declaration and click ‘Submit assessment to QA’.
If you have further queries regarding using BREEAM Projects to submit an assessment please contact us at BREEAM@bre.co.uk
or ask a quick question on Live Chat.
How to submit on BREEAM Projects using the basic upload form - KBCN1185
Details of the different schemes, types and versions that can be submitted using a pre-filled MS excel scoring and reporting tool can be found in KBCN1183
- Find the assessment within your project folders and click on ‘Submit BREEAM Report/QA evidence’
- The form will be pre-filled with the details of the assessment and assessor. Select the assessment stage, Fast track and add any notes or additional information then click ‘Next’.
- Click the ‘Browse’ button to select your Assessment report and then click next.
- Then upload the evidence by clicking the ‘Browse’ button and adding the files to the file queue. Once in the file queue then click ‘Upload Files’
- If the Browse button on the evidence upload page is not showing please follow instructions in KBCN1163 and KBCN1117
- Once all the evidence files have been uploaded you must press the ‘Submit’ button at the bottom for the files and submission to be sent to BREEAM QA.
My client insists the credit is met because it was ‘accepted’ on a previous assessment - KBCN0837
BRE will support assessors in our role as an accredited certification body, particularly where they feel a non-compliant solution is being pushed on them on the basis that it has been 'accepted' on previous assessments by assessors or BRE. In such instances, and for any scenarios where the assessor requires support, you can contact us (BREEAM Technical Support) for an impartial view to assist with your verification.
In such situations, it would be helpful in the first instance, to explain the audit and certification process to the client and clarify why the proposed solution may not be compliant. Whilst it may be a consideration in the process of verification for a specific assessment, implying compliance or accepting evidence of it solely on the basis of an assessment on a previous project, potentially by a different assessor, is not good assessment or certification practice.
We strongly advise assessors not to submit assessments based on evidence that you know or believe to be non-compliant in the hope that it will either not be selected for QA or we that we will simply accept compliance in such instances. Doing so could put an assessor in breach of your licensing terms and lead to suspension or termination. A large part of the value of BREEAM is in its certification, if certification is based on invalid or unverified assessment of performance it undermines the scheme, assessors and BRE.
New Fees – main changes and key points – FS036 Rev27 From 1 July 2017 - KBCN0879
Note: FS036 rev 28 is effective from 1st December 2019 - See KBCN1366
- The layout and format of the fee sheet has been redesigned to list all the fees by scheme rather than service.
- We have introduced a licence fee for BREEAM International New Construction (NC) and BREEAM International Refurbishment and Fit-Out (RFO) assessors (please see fee sheet and briefing note for details).
- We have aligned the Home Quality Mark (HQM) and BREEAM Domestic Refurbishment (BDR) certification fees and introduced a diminishing ‘fee per dwelling’ for higher volume assessments.
- Changes have been made to the registration fee for BREEAM UK NC (Non-Domestic) and BREEAM UK RFO.
- The BREEAM International NC Registration fee has been amended to remove the scaled registration fee determined by building size.
- Changes have been made to the BREEAM International NC certification fees.
- Changes have been made to the BREEAM UK NC certification fees – removing the standard, non-standard and bespoke categories, and introducing a fee scale based on development size to align with other BREEAM schemes.
- All new fees apply from 1 July 2017 – licence, registration and certification.
- Registrations completed from 1 July 2017 will be charged the new registration and certification fee - this includes previous version registrations and registration transfer from one organisation to another.
- New certification fees are therefore not applicable to existing registered assessments or assessments registered up to 30 June 2017 (see the exception in the briefing note and see Operational Guidance SD5070).
- Certification fees will be charged under the new fee structure for assessments registered from 1 July 2017 (including previous versions and registration transfers between assessor organisations).
- International NC and RFO licence fees will be charged at the next licence renewal of the company licence agreement from 1 July 2017 or for new applications received from 1 July 2017.
Provision of Design Stage evidence for Post Construction audit - KBCN0504
Where compliance is demonstrated at post construction by confirming ‘no change’ from the design stage assessment, or where the evidence requirement states ‘as design stage’, the design stage evidence should be reviewed by the assessor as part of their post construction assessment, and therefore referenced and provided for audit within the post construction submission.
This evidence may be audited if the issue is selected for QA, and non-conformances may be raised in relation to the evidence if issues are found, as final certification cannot take place when there are any outstanding non-conformances from evidence relating to either stage of the assessment process.
QA timescales - KBCN0526
Once an assessment has been received and booked in by the BREEAM QA Team, a specific feedback date will be provided via email. This will be an indication of the latest date that feedback should be issued for an assessment, and wherever possible feedback will be issued earlier.
Our current average turnaround times for QA in all schemes is available within BREEAM Projects/the BREEAM Extranet, in the following location: QA Timescales and Fast Track Application Form
Quality Assurance (QA) Failure Charge - KBCN0508
In certain circumstances BRE Global will charge a fee for assessment failure (as per FS036). This is to encourage the submission of assessments to the required quality, avoid misuse of the QA process and ensure efficient use of QA auditors’ time (and therefore avoid delays in auditing other licensed assessors’ assessments).
The assessment failure charge applies to the following circumstances:
- Where a significant number of non-conformances are identified
- The non-conformances indicate a fundamental misunderstanding by the assessor of how to apply and comply with the scheme - we reserve the right to conduct an audit of additional parts of the assessment where non-conformances are indicative of systematic misinterpretation of the scheme by the assessor
- The assessor submits supporting evidence beyond the ten working day deadline
Where an assessment failure has been identified, a report is issued to the assessor identifying the relevant corrective actions he/she needs to take before re-submitting the assessment. The assessment failure fee will be charged to the licensed organisation by BRE Global.
Re-certification - KBCN0516
It is sometimes possible for an assessment to be resubmitted after certification for a higher rating. When this is requested, the BREEAM QA team must be informed in advance of resubmitting the report. It must also be stated clearly within the cover letter/email with the report resubmission that this is what is being requested.
Requests for re-certification will be considered on a case-by-case basis, by the Certification Manager, to determine whether it is appropriate to proceed. Factors influencing the decision will include but are not limited to:
- Time since original certification
- Building type
- Number of additional credits to be awarded
If it is agreed that this may proceed, a new audit will be carried out of any additional credits added in. The assessor may also need to confirm and if necessary provide supporting evidence to demonstrate, that there have been no other changes to aspects of the project for which credits are being retained.
The assessment will be subject to first submission timescales and the full certification fee (in line with FS036).
Schemes and types on BREEAM Projects - KBCN1069
Many schemes and types can now be submitted via BREEAM Projects. This compliance note lists the schemes that are available via BREEAM projects and can be submitted using the BREEAM Projects online portal
Assessors will upload new assessments to us through an assessment submission portal within BREEAM Projects, rather than the extranet upload tool, for all schemes other than BREEAM In-Use, CSH, EcoHomes and any other scheme version released prior to 1st January 2008. The exception to this will be assessments completed through BREEAM Recognised Software
, which should continue to be submitted via the Recognised platform (which is linked to our systems). This means that we will no longer accept assessment submissions for the affected schemes through post (CD/memory stick), email, FTP upload or other means, with the exception of BREEAM Recognised Software.
Assessments can continue to be completed using offline tools (e.g. the MS Excel BREEAM New Construction Scoring and Reporting Tool). In such instances the assessor will simply upload the file to BREEAM Projects at the point of submission, at the click of a few buttons, rather than issued to BREEAM through any other means.
Schemes and types that are available through BREEAM Projects:
- BREEAM UK New Construction (2008, 2011, 2014 & 2018) - excluding the exceptions below
- BREEAM International New Construction (2009, 2010, 2013 & 2016) - excluding the exceptions below
- BREEAM UK Refurbishment & Fit-Out (2014) - excluding Bespoke developed criteria
- BREEAM International Refurbishment & Fit-Out (2014) - excluding Bespoke developed criteria
- BREEAM UK Domestic Refurbishment (2012 & 2014)
- Home Quality Mark (2015 Beta)
- BREEAM Infrastructure New Construction (2015)
Schemes that are currently not available to upload through BREEAM Projects, the extranet upload tool and FTP uploads will still be accepted:
- BREEAM Communities
- BREEAM UK NC Simple Buildings
- BREEAM Bespoke Developed Criteria Projects – UK & International (NC & RFO)
- BREEAM Data Centres
- BREEAM UK NC Fire Stations, Multi-Residential, Visitor Centres and Whitbread Premier Inn 2008 versions
- Code for Sustainable Homes
- BREEAM In-Use
- NSO BREEAM Schemes
- All Pre-2008 BREEAM Schemes
Security sensitive projects - KBCN0525
For security sensitive projects, all technical queries, QA submissions and QA enquiries can be sent to secureBREEAM@bre.co.uk
. Only security cleared (SC level
) staff have access to this inbox and work on security sensitive projects.
When registering the project, there is an option to mark the project 'confidential'. This means that no information will be listed on our Greenbook Live public listings page once the project has been certified.
In exceptional circumstances it may be possible for an auditor to carry out QA of an assessment at the client's office or another location agreed with BRE Global, the assessor company and the client. Additional fees will apply and it may not always be possible to accommodate this request. Please send an email to BREEAM@bre.co.uk
marked for the attention of the Certification Manager if you wish to discuss this option.
Shell & core project: Completing as fully-fitted - KBCN0394
It is possible to complete an assessment as fully fitted following a design stage certification as a shell & core project. Whilst the assessment will reference much of the same evidence gathered for design stage, it must be re-registered and may be submitted as a fully-fitted Post-construction assessment.
17/04/18 Wording clarified
Simple Buildings – Quality Assurance (QA) - KBCN0459
The process and rigor of quality assurance does not change for Simple Building assessments. As with any assessment, the correct classification of the development will be checked. Where a project is incorrectly classified, the project will require re-assessment against the correct BREEAM criteria before the QA and certification process can progress. There may be additional charges associated with this process.
Due to Simple Buildings not being a separate scheme, the audit level assigned to the assessment (Admin, Partial or Full) will follow the standard approach, i.e. previous audit records for that building type will be reviewed. Also, QA response times are the same as for other assessments of the same building type.
Suspension of work due to non-payment of invoices - KBCN0511
Payment of any invoices relating to BREEAM work must be made within 30 days of the date of issue (PN173, clause 7 iii).
We appreciate that in some circumstances it may not be possible for a company to meet these payment terms. To allow additional time for payment, therefore, we currently given an extended period to make payment before suspension (PN173, clause 25 (v)) on BREEAM accounts is applied. At this point BRE is unable to process any technical or non-technical queries, registrations, QA, certifications, or bespoke or licence applications.
If you have any queries regarding any outstanding invoices, or general queries about your account, please contact the BREEAM Licensing Team on 0333 321 88 11 or via BREEAM@bre.co.uk
Translation Requirements when submitting an assessment with evidence in a language other than English - KBCN0515
BREEAM assessments may be submitted with supporting evidence in a language other than English. Where this is the case, it must be clearly stated within the covering email/upload notes whether all documents are in English and, if not, which language they are in. If translation is required BRE Global will source this service and fees will be charged to the assessor company in accordance with FS036.
If this is not confirmed by the assessor upon submission, it will be assumed that all documentation is in English and the BRE Global translator service is not required. Once QA commences, if it subsequently transpires that the translation service is required, the QA will be halted and a delay of up to a 2 further weeks is likely, as BRE Global will need to book and wait for a translator to be available.
This applies even where only a proportion of the evidence documents require translation.
Where the assessor/assessor organisation are undertaking translation or appointing a third party to undertake translation on their client’s behalf, they must use an ‘appropriate translator’. Please refer to SD5070, 'BREEAM Operations Manual' for the options available and requirements for meeting the definition of an ‘appropriate translator’. Confirmation of the type of translator used and their qualifications must form a part of the licenced assessor’s evidence submission. This correspondence must be signed/confirmed by the ‘appropriate translator’ and the licenced assessor.
The validation statement within the assessment/reporting tool, where the assessor clarifies how compliance is achieved, must always be completed by the assessor in English and not in the local language.
Using BREEAM certification mark - KBCN1350
For details on how licensed assessors can access the certification mark and specific rules for use please see KBCN1347
The BREEAM certification mark can only be used in relation to a certified assessment and is issued by BRE Global only.
The mark must be displayed with text to describe the scheme and a unique identification number written below the mark. BRE Global will provide the unique text which can then be added to the certification mark.
The following text must be included at least once on all materials (including websites) which include one or more of the BREEAM logos, marks or symbols. The text should appear as footnote text that is legible to the naked eye on either the front or back page of documents and on all website pages where the logo appears.
“BREEAM is a registered trademark of BRE (the Building Research Establishment Ltd. Community Trade Mark E5778551). The BREEAM marks, logos and symbols are the Copyright of BRE and are reproduced by permission”
Version of ASWL that should be submitted to QA - KBCN0910
The version of the ASWL that should be submitted is the one that was current at the time of registration or a later version, but not an older version. The following dates were taken from the appropriate Process Note. For post construction assessment, the registration date at design stage of the project should be considered
- version 35.0 August 2021
- version 34.0 May 2020
- version 33.0 December 2019
- version 32.1 April 2019
- version 32 February 2019
- version 31.1 October 2018
- version 30 November 2017
- version 29 November 2016
- version 28 March 2016
- version 27 February 2015
- version 26 November 2014
- version 25 July 2014
- version 24 June 2014
- version 23 June 2013
- version 22.1 December 2012
- version 21 September 2012
Please always indicate the version of the ASWL that has been submitted to QA, either in the name of the document or in the report.
Please note the upload dates within BREEAM Projects (stated underneath each ASWL file) may be different to the dates above. Please ensure the dates above are always used.
Who determines compliance the Assessor or BRE? - KBCN0839
In the BREEAM assessment model, the assessor determines compliance and BRE Global quality-assures the assessment. Rather than saying definitively that an assessor's decision is incorrect, the QA process may raise a finding (Non-Conformance) where it is not clear that compliance is demonstrated.
BREEAM technical support cannot generally confirm compliance, as that would be deemed as advice, which could conflict with our need to remain impartial as the certifying body. However, we can, and do, support the assessor in the decision-making/assessment process, affording confidence through assisting with interpretation of the criteria in any given scenario. Ultimately, however, it is the role of the licensed BREEAM assessor to determine compliance and to demonstrate this with appropriate evidence in their assessment report.
Information correct as of 16thSeptember 2021. Please see kb.breeam.com for the latest compliance information.